i think they just messed up, 213s is roughly when the actual rocket was visible so it might be the same incident
2 Likes
also anyone know what this thing is on the hud?
“PF”
but in cerilic
1 Like
the 213 is time to impact, in seconds
1 Like
those articles were posted before the hud pics were released.
looks like r-27 may be overperforming heavily, will be writing a report to make it ~25 gs
@Grimtax you think the assessment is correct? I know you’ve read through this book b4, what you think?
are there any reports about the seeker?
this doc also goes over seekerhead, which I think has already been reported b4 but denied though.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IA1wypLIZtPl
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/todo3RATsYNY
1 Like
so itll stay probably overperforming?
1 Like
seekerhead? yeah. maybe not maneuverability though, as dual plane has explicitly been denied. so if i put in a report for r-27 should be limited to 25g single plane, that might go through (if im understanding it right)
1 Like
astonishing 1 of 30 hit rate but better guidance than AIM-7M
1 Like
not like the 7M had a better hit rate
there were reports of only one out of for sparrows firing on F-15s
it had a way better hit rate. order of magnitude better
30 out of 44 in gulf war
4 Likes
ah yeah 2/3 is about the same hit rate as 1/30
get your math correct 3/4 isnt 2/3
just stop talking atp, your making yourself look worse
yeah ik, thats what i mean
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
to be fair it excludes another 44 recorded missile uses that were listed in logistics data but not confirmed as actual combat engagements. so its really 30/88