Suggestion for the armament on the JAS 39A and JAS 39C

IRRC E model is also compatible with Brimstone’s which is more than enough for Gaijin to add them considering they added AGM65G to Swedish C model even tho it never used them irl.

At a higher BR as well as the F22 doesn’t have HMD

Kinda hate that you probably aren’t even wrong.

1 Like

understatement

I dont remember the rest of the complaints besides i think AGM65G (which should go and be replaced by the IR RBS15Mk 3 trust me bro)

The stance is as long as there is a need (balance) and they can use it they can get it. Which is why sweden got the G alongside the SAAF which historically got MS20 systems to use GBU-39 and has access to ground munitions they never used.

They are retrofitting with HMD and gaijin will most likely add with HMD.

I want RBS 15 😿

But it would be a losing battle to correct it, and AGM 65 at least provides us something until they bother.

I could see it being either

1 Like

Thats what im saying, as long as Gaijin see it fits they will add it.

F22 (early) 13.0
F22 (late) 15.0

Putting coin on it now.

Why not the worst of both worlds

id rather a gimped RBS15 than a mav we should never have had

1 Like

oh ye. all that too.

fair enough.

Likewise. But RBS 15 isn’t coming the same way exocet isn’t. If it were, I’d happily be rid of the 65.

Hope not.

Exocet doesnt have an air to ground mode tho i think
RBS 15 has an IR mode for it and RBS 15MK 4 is just air to ground lmao

Honestly id kill for a list of all the NG’s and their differences because learning there are Gripen C’s with the NG designation and E equivalent NG’s hurts when trying to figure out which had which lmao.

Have you made a suggestion for RBS?

It will most likely be like that.

Yeah but it’s the issue that RBS 15 started out for smiting boats. So they’ll consider it the same category as Exocet, so we ain’t getting it.

I would love to be proven wrong, but I have no faith in them.