Submarines - WT Discussion

Subs with missiles would be pretty cool.

The TMA-1 mine: a torpedo-tube launched weapon used by WW2 Uboats w/ the 533mm torpedo tube, similar in concept to the Type M Mk.2 I’ve talked abt previously

Very interesting that it 's appeared in the files today !

In the case of submarines with high performance torpedoes, like Japanese submarines, I think they can be integrated into the game. They can fire torpedoes with a range of 9km or 12km, so if they move forward a bit they can join the fight. I also believe that the submarine’s play style will be the same as the Japanese DD’s play style, which is partying torpedoes in a safe area until the end of the game. However, they will not be able to shed as many torpedoes as the Shimakaze, so they will not have to worry about breaking the game balance.

First of all, Gaijin THANK YOU, for giving us naval players more to do.
The mode isn’t perfect yet, but I love it, when you add some way to sneak past people would be amazing, I had already some nice moments in three matches.

by the way, you could implement the way of calculating from the submarines to all (big) ships, it would make throwing torpedos a bit harder than it is at the moment.

Guys don’t go ballistic, let them improve the mode and we need submarines, especially with all the big battleships camping in the spawn and sniping the cruisers and destroyers.

2 Likes

I must say that submarines have proven to be very viable vessels in WT. They can be quite a threat even to destroyers if they are played correctly. I think submarines would liven up standard naval battles as well.

Hi, if you have specific feedback for the ongoing event the devs are watching this thread for feedback: ( https://forum.warthunder.com/t/battle-of-the-atlantic-ships-against-submarines )

This one 's just a WT community discussion abt subs, sorry !

1 Like

Continuing the discussion from Discussion of the Submarine event and possible balancing:

In fact, WT Mobile already has the Pr.613( and also seems to have been the source for the visual model of the Type 7 in the event, dagorengine cross-compatibility ftw !)


While here in WT, we’ve had the Mk.9 torpedo used by the R- and S-classe submarines for some time now
image-1

We have some of these in the files too, the G7e(TIIIa) ( which currently lacks a visual model ) and the 53-39PM
image-1

Honeslty you’re thinking too much. Battlefield 1942 (original battlefield only in PC) already made it possible and showed there ways to submarine warfare without it breaking the game
Here’s some easy and difficult fixes/additions to allow subs
Before I get started let me iterate that subs should only be added from years corresponding to the bluewater/coastal craft years. A post WW2 nuclear sub will have to be nerfed if a WW1 battleship vessel is to have some level of chance
so basically only ww2 mid war unguided torps can be used and deck gun ammo is severely limited and if ballistic missiles are added the damage isn’t realistic (lessened)

Easy fixes
1 torp length, fire depth, speed, and damage amount (for torps for subs only) and amount of reload torps/time to reload torps at capped point

2 time at depth (air quality and battery charge)
3 fixing anti sub rockets/depth charge/anti sub grenade aiming

4 making depth charge depths variable in battle

5 anti sub packages for planes

6 limiting the amount of sub players allowed per team (prob 2-4 per team of 14 players, only a single spawn per match outside of plane to min/max the risk/reward factors and set a limit to time between sub matches so they can’t keep running subs)

Difficult fixes
1 allowed use of towed sonar (requires better tow mechanics like research into tow line breaking points, research which ships/boats were deployed with these packages, developing visuals like the chikugo is just it being tossed overboard/pulled up the side)

2 adding torpedo nets on ships that have them (almost all the WW1 battleships have them most are already on the models)

3 addition of sonar radar for anti sub planes and the controls on how it works

4 potential addition of larger ballistic missiles (unguided, short rocket powered for initial launch and then arc/glide to target) so subs have a longer range attack method (advanced subs only, reward for effort, allows avoidance of anti sub protections) and certain ships/boats can enjoy their missile packages (finally have a use for the albatross’s missile tubes besides visual aesthetics) and the anti rocket defenses to handle those missiles

Honeslty most of this should be easy to add to the game

Surcouf time !

I saw the x-ray of the Type VII on youtube and I dream of seeing the same thing for the surcouf, it would just be insane and i hope every country (that can) gonna have their subs if they come in the game. Because yep, some navy outside the “3 glory” (+UK) have also subs.

For those who don’t know the surcouf, here’s a little presentation of this French monster :D

Largest submarine in the world until 1942, when the Japanese subs-carrier class went a little bigger.

Crew 126
Length 110 m
Main beam 9 m
Draught 7.07 m
Displacement 3,304 t on surface
4,218 t diving
Propulsion Surface: 2 x 7,600 hp diesel engines
Underwater: 2 x 3,400 hp electric motors
2 propellers
Speed 19 knots (35 km/h) on surface
9 knots (17 km/h) diving
Depth 80 meters (maximum safety)

Armament 2 x 203 mm cannons with 300 rounds

2 AA 37 mm model 1925 guns with 500 rounds

10 torpedo tubes:

-4 front Ø 550mm tubes offset by 2° on the axis - model 1917

-2 triple OSD 1925 turrets aft (1 Ø 550mm tube and 2 Ø 400mm tubes)

12 reserve torpedoes (8 Ø 550mm + 4 Ø 400mm).

Range 10000 nautical miles at 10 knots on the surface

60 nautical miles at 5 knots diving

Aircraft 1 Besson MB-411 seaplane (yup)



image

image

2 Likes

The Vanguard-classe, HMS Vigilant(S30) is back in the files for the anniversary, I’ve gotten some images of it from the CDK while it 's here:


image-1


image-1
image-1
image-1


image-1
image-1
image-1


image-1
image-1
image-1


image-1
image-1
image-1


They really worked hard to model a vehicle which has only been playable for ~120 hours over a five-year period, eh ?


( [Development] Vanguard-Class Nuclear Submarines: On Guard for the Queen - News - War Thunder )

1 Like

They usually do. Remember the old days walking tank that got massive enthusiasm of developers and not coming back though many people wants it.

1 Like

First pic of your post isn’t the Surcouf though, it’s from a japanese movie called Lorelei: The Witch of the Pacific Ocean.

Oh damn, my bad, don’t know this movie.

Edit: well, looks like they make a movie and HEAVILY used the surcouf as inspiration for this submarine.

So technically it’s him :p

1 Like

Any other modern sub in the files ?

So far as I can tell, it 's just Vigilant for the anniversary hangar. Still, the level of detail on it is incredible - and since much of the mechanics of the current event/test are reused from the one it appeared in, imo it 's worth archiving to have ready to compare to later additions.

Not quite the topic here, but yes I remember. I also remember:

Spoiler

how a number of new walking tanks appeared in the 2.7.0.55 model leak:
YPJ62A7


vyt41BT
UUJLKLC
cIym1kT
0cRBnq6
PmDlI93
gIDG4GF
REkcFkC
g0VAcmU
8OAZ7xV
3hHubcB
v9JFFO3

fdeKpOC

( https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/o1cz8v/27053_27055_changes/?rdt=64730 / 2.7.0.55 new )

And in addition to that, how

Spoiler

a few - but not all - of those walking tanks were later used for a similar April event in Darkflow 's Enlisted:
usa_f1132c6408549adddbf1dbb9d08ed504
Ger_e126c79bab628ead35bff1b729b3276d
Ussr_87df22309a6e3d876d277a8ffacf0275



( “TITAN RISE” — open test - News - Enlisted )

1 Like

I’m going to copy across what I posted on reddit, as my sort of feedback in regards to submarines as they are in the current event and what I think could be added/removed prior to them being put into naval proper:

So we’ve got the uboat vs destroyers event now which is quite possibly a test run for the introduction of submarines into naval. I think this has the opportunity to be a lot of fun, but there are a number of tweaks that I think might be needed before they are added.

Uboats

Longer dive times, option for Crash dive similar to the Blow Ballast option (r)

Harder for AI spotters to spot at distance/weather conditions/night

Can hear enemy destroyers/freighters when dived, the slower the speed the longer the range. Options for researchable sonar upgrades (GHG to KDB to Balkon, etc)

Dive deeper than 60m

Give deck gun back

Longer range torpedoes than 2000m.

No deck gun or AAA gun when mostly underwater.

Rear torpedo tube for torpedoes, mines optional loadout.

Destroyers

Passive Sonar has a longer range the slower the ship travels, at flank speed it could run over a stereo and not hear it

ASDIC fairly well implemented in game, be sure that there’s the blind spot underneath though.

Depth charges need to be manually set between shallow, medium and deep

Hedgehogs where historical

Radar where historical?

General

In RB Naval, seperate spawn points for submarines that aren’t visible from the enemys spawn like current surface spawns are.

Submarines will probably be more useful in Enduring confrontation like bombers are

If the goal is to attack a convoy, then submarines should have the chance to get ahead of the convoy and dive. Will stop the destroyers spawn camping the submarines?

Special submarines, Surcouf, I-400 (launches planes like Battleships do in game now), maybe HMS X1? Gyro-copter for later uboats?

The bigger the submarine the longer the dive time.

Dive times, torpedo reloads and such can be affected by crew skills

Radar for submarines where historical, radar detection for subs where historical

Radar for anti submarine aircraft?

Night battles? Spotlights, star shells? Big disadvantage for ships without radar though (Cape Matapan).

Different torpedoes for different navies, but limited by BR, so a Type VIIA at a lower battle rating than a VIIC/42 wouldn’t be able to carry G7es homing torpedoes.

Foxer noise makers for Destroyers at the right BR, BOLD for uboats

You should post feedback for the event in the correct area in this forum on the event in the comments as everyone else is.

1 Like

And I do not agree about dive times being added. Tanks do not have fuel limitations for running, ships do not. And just like how submarines do not have fuel timers they also should not have battery or oxygen timers as submarines could stay underwater on average much longer than the 25minute time limit of rb battles. If we get matches in naval rb back at the 1hr timelimit or more then that is a discussion for then. But the timescale for these battles is not an area you could reasonably add oxygen limitations other than making them highly unrealistic.

1 Like

Will do. Thank you :)

Battery timers could make a tad sense. I’m not sure on the submerged range of a Type VII, but it should be pretty limited, atleast when running at flank speed