Gripen is significantly easier to do well in
Also F-16I with 120C-5 and much better FM is far superior
1 Like
uhh, 120C-5 vs R-77+R-27ER combo?
120C loses
1 Like
120C-5, 6 missiles, an FM slightly better than the F-16C, and far superior.
L.M.A.O.
Can you tell me what the ‘C’ stands for in RPC and ROC?
2 Likes
ROC is Republic Of China (Taiwan) and PRC is Popular Republic of China (mainland China). He probably said RPC because that’s how it’s spelled in some languages
Edit: I read the messages above, my bad. But your point doesn’t stand because there are several cases of countries sharing a part of their name. North and South Korea are two distinct countries for example. Politics aren’t allowed here so let’s not go any further, but I don’t think it would be political to remark that, politics aside, ROC and PRC are in fact two distinct and independent entities with different military equipment. Let’s not debate this any further though, moderators will quickly smite us if this turns into questioning political stuff
They’re downgrades from 13.7 planes, yes - but with how the matchmaker is they get to keep bullying late Phantoms and assorted swing-wing shitboxes. Decompression all the way, these 2020s jets should not be fighting phantoms on the regular
2 Likes
China…
Cue my KWS desperately trying to point its nose at F-2A ADTW thats coming to reenact that scene where cap america rips log apart with his hands without my consent
Sometimes when I manage to land and respawn my F4F ICE and in the distance I read “Jas or F-2” I just J out on runway and leave.
Like, ok you get amraams but they can evade with such ease that you are just cooked after.
After finally playing F-2A ADTW, some platforms do feel like youre playing naval and no amount of ARHs will save them
What makes it worse is that you can’t even hope of being undetected by it, the moment you get that ping on rwr you already know…
Spoiler
2 Likes
'26 phantom experience ladies and gents
2 Likes
Same br as F-18A btw
2 Likes
Yeah… they’re all totally fine where they are, the issue is what sits just above them. The EJ is a drastic example, but everything 12.0-12.7 with limited or no BVR capabilities has to fight FOX-3s. Regularly. If it was just Derbys pre-buff, sure, whatever. However, fighting R-77s and 120As in an upgraded F-4E from 1984 (base plane from 1965) is complete bs. At least the early Hornet can hold its own against these things, whereas the EJ just loses.
Just standard war thunder.
2- 3 vics at every BR are good. The rest are just to make up the numbers
Kfir at 12.0 or an even better treat phantom at 12.3. The cope list is massive
That example of yours is a poor one because it relies on a false equivalence; Taiwan is not recognized by the overwhelming majority of countries—including the one where I live—and furthermore, Taiwan has no representation at the UN or even a consulate, simply because 180 countries, including the US, recognize only one China: mainland China.
In the case of the Koreas, both are recognized and maintain diplomatic representation with other countries and at the UN.
Regardless of your political stance, Taiwan is China, and its in-game vehicles should be placed within the Chinese tech tree.
I don’t know what they used, just saying that Bhishma has pretty much the same or extremely similar armor profile from the front as BMPT at 10.3.
You really don’t know the differences between 120S and AGS besides crewless turret ?
Power of hindsight in play.
At 11.3 it definitely wasn’t a menace at it’s own BR.
That is still extremely vague and those players are still more than prone to making mistakes, especially if they’re asked to do something so important for the game.
Again, this still isn’t objective in any way.
Whether you publish the debate or not, it would still make forum know-it-alls scream about unfairness, preferential treatment and whatnot.
You know for a fact that Gaijin will blindly listen to everything said there, without taking into consideration their own thoughts and opinions ?
That’s not even the question, I was just highlighting the blatant falacity of your argument that both have “China” in their name. I’m well aware of the official status of both entities. Anyway, why did you bring this up in a conversation about a game? It’s annoying how every conversation about China or Taiwan converges into that debate somehow
That’s what you implied and if not it is a meaningless point to make. Even if we exclude the Relict’s KE/CE protection and assume that frontal protection is similar. that doesn’t mean the side armor profile as well as internal protection is the same.
Had the BMPT had the Bishma’s hull, the complaints about this tank wouldn’t nearly be as bad.
Of course speed plays a factor but you’re missing the point. But if you want to go for a direct comparison that would be the M1A1, which keep in mind not only has better speed but has better hull and turret ring armor. the AGS is only slighly faster than M1A1 but you sacrifice significant armor and firepower. Again this part of the conversation stemmed from:
You also need to tell me what’s better ? Main cannon that can fire 3BM42 every 6-7s or an anemic autocannon with missiles strapped to it.
comes down to opinion but I’m confident to say it was a menace since by just me holding W and left clicking I almost got a 2kd.
Did I ever make that argument? That wasn’t the context of that quote btw.
You think the current system is better? they could go with stat based balancing where they filter out a certain population of the playerbase to get better representation of stats. the idea that it costs them too much time or money for them to do something is just hard to believe.
Again, what you’re asking for is a system that isn’t objective and isn’t beneficial for the average player.