Su-27SM: Ferocious Flanker!

It does have a 35KM lock range, but the actual “track” range is around 9-12KM depending on target size.

On some rare occasions you can lock the ground near something at beyond the track range, and the missile will begin to track the target if the target starts to move when the missile is within the track range, though.

1 Like

i believe track range is the same for all x29s, being 6km 12km for all, hmm

The TD will do 9km on most things, 12 on things like the Flarakrad. The standard T is 6km.

But the truth is, to get that tracking lock, the plane is within SAM range. So in all honesty, the SM3 will still reign supreme even if the Su27SM gets a pod.

It needs the pod, IMO.

if its sight stab wont get added then it will need a pod

It will be stronger due to bein supersonic platform that can effectively engage with other jets.

Still it will be worse then F-16C, so im just waiting another whining thread from you.

in what way

Flight performance, Cas capacity.

Biggest advantage Su27SM does have is the A2A loadout, F-16C will still be Better in CAS role due to amount of ordinance it can carry.

So yea im expecting another thread for that.

ok first, doesnt matter, US mains will whine anyways

second, its still quite alot, atleast for a russian jet, 5 guided a2g on a fighter is something you dont see often(or at all rather)

Russian mains are the one who keep whining despite having Su-25M3 and Pantsir.

M3 is so broken that nothing can come close in terms of Cas abilities, the reason for that its because KH-38MT’s are literally outranges any NATO spaa while it doesnt have to deal with Pantsir, not to mention it has the best RWR that can detect Pantsir Radar lock and launch, ıt also has MAWS that can give you early warning.

Yea better then previous Russian jets but still inferior to Su-25M3 in terms of pure cas abilities.

It doesnt matter tbh, if they add targeting pod then i will use 27SM due to bein supersonic platform, if they dont then i will keep using Su-25M3.

this is how disconnected from the game the devs are

1 Like

I’m not crying.I was against the introduction of the Pantsir S1 and X-38 MT for the Su-25SM3 (it cannot use these missiles, this is a Gaijin invention), But the missile is not yet correctly configured. With the right setup, NATO players would shed tears

Oh i wonder, maybe there is a huge technological differences between those vehicles and Nato ones, maybe?

Without technological priviliges Russia is the one who will shed tears, Leopard2A7 and Strv-122’s are living proof for that.

Anyway enough with this discussion, im not interested in piss contest.

1 Like

What is the proof? What are you playing about here? In life, when you hit a tank, everyone immediately leaves the tank because people WANT TO LIVE.

Its true that in case of nuclear war there will be no winners, the thing is every country on this world knows that and they will not use nuclear weapons as solution unless there is no other options.

Dude be real, the vast majority of the complaining on this forum comes from US players.

Though it is kind of funny you concede that the F16C is still a better option than the SU27SM would be even with a pod.

If that’s the case, what’s the issue? Having a pod makes CAS more fun and engaging. It’s a game, after all.

3 Likes

Not really, almost every nation loves to complain to certain degree, doesnt matter if its Us or Russia but the thing is even with all those artifical advantages Russian players finds a new way to complain.

Because it is? F-16 can carry more A2G munition while having similiar amount of A2A missiles and better flight performance.

However in terms of pure Cas ability Su-25M3 is still the best.

Never said i have any issues about upcoming Su-27SM and its armament, in fact i clearly stated that if it becomes better then Su-25M3 i will use it.

Please show me single sentence where said it shouldnt get its thermal pod, whats funny is i asked thermal pod for SMT for a good amount of time but instead we recieved Su-25M3.

Meanwhile, I started working on the R-77-1

Spoiler

2 Likes

You got killed in a yt vid on the dev server

Have a feeling I know by who.

Was it by a MICA firing aircraft?

1 Like

you would be the one shedding tears if NATO planes were given SLAM-ER

1 Like