After finally discovering and completing the Su-22M3, I found that its BR 11.0 rating was too high. We can already talk about its M4 version, which has the same BR (11.0) and is essentially the same, except that it has 384 additional countermeasures compared to 12 for the Su-22M3. On this point, the Su-22M3 is very weak; 12 countermeasures, even if they are large caliber, are insufficient for an Su-22M3. While the Su-22M3 does have a slightly better engine, this doesn’t compensate for the lack of 12 countermeasures. Furthermore, the aircraft is generally not very maneuverable. One might assume that the aircraft would be very fast, but that’s not really the case. It’s very rare to be able to escape an enemy, which makes it difficult when our role is to bomb. And the third point that makes this plane absolutely unworthy of 11.0 is that it has R60M 30g missiles. Six all-aspect missiles with 30g sounds great, except that one countermeasure is all it takes for the missile to miss. I’ve rarely seen such useless IR missiles. The only possible kill with them is if the enemy hasn’t spotted you, but unfortunately, that’s very rare. All of this leads me to conclude that this plane has no place in 11.0 and that there are much better alternatives, even at lower battle ratings. Tell me what you think.
Compression, Next!
10.7 is the BR for subsonic/ bad FM all-aspect carriers. sadly su22m3 have to be higher
and this is why its 11.0
Its already a superior strike aircraft in terms of FM to several 10.7 strike aircraft, such as the Jaguar. It should not be at 10.7 whilst retaining all-aspect missiles. Though I think the simpler answer is to just move the other Su-22s with a boat of CMs up to 11.3
Nah it’s fine besides it not the only all aspect strike fighter at 11.0
That is also a bad solution considering that they aren’t super powerful at 11.0 in the first place.
No, but what 11.3 ground attackers are
Dont the M3s also get like 15% more thrust or something?