Proving both that it existed in some form and was compatible with the Su-17’s, being an incredibly obscure missile idea that appeared a long time after the Su-17M4.
And no, assuming based on being able to use Kh-25MLs and Kh-29T’s doesn’t count.
This really help Germany in CAS and will serve as a good alternative to Su-25BM for Soviets.
1 Like
old form programming on pylons for guided weapons was simply like this
- lockFunction()
- aimSeekerFunction()
- spoolFunction()
etc and these were cross compatible
That’s not a source.
No sources = not happening.
Hi, forwarded as a suggestion
Doesn’t mean its been accepted by the devs, it means the mods forwarded it for the devs to look at.
And given that was more than a year ago…
hey you asked for sources, bro had enuf to convince the tech mods, that was my only aim
We don’t know what they had. If the Kh-25MT existed and was tested, its highly unlikely to have been on the SU-17’s or MiG-27’s, more likely the Su-25T/39 which was listed on the report.
We have no idea what was passed on to the devs as a suggestion, but I doubt it was the Su-17M4/22M4.
cross compatibility is the word
Sources is the other word
You have to prove its cross compatible
its a Kh-25 for gods sake.
theyre all built on the same platform
No sources = never going to happen
well ur a tough nut arent ya
Reported this a couple months ago
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/l4btYztAj288
1 Like
2 secondary sources
quite enough as proof wouldnt you say hehe
1 Like
yep, saw ur report. got with dontkev and added to his list
i wonder how the Vyuga pod’s functionality will be modelled… both in 3rd person and cockpit view