Su-17M4, Su-22M4 in the German and Russian Tech Trees

then what?

while ive seen sources for it, im not sure if it actually was although there should be no real wiring limitation

tbh as an upgrade, id take cluster bombs to drop on spawn so i can get rid of SPAA EZPZ

Proving both that it existed in some form and was compatible with the Su-17’s, being an incredibly obscure missile idea that appeared a long time after the Su-17M4.

And no, assuming based on being able to use Kh-25MLs and Kh-29T’s doesn’t count.

This really help Germany in CAS and will serve as a good alternative to Su-25BM for Soviets.

1 Like

old form programming on pylons for guided weapons was simply like this

  • lockFunction()
  • aimSeekerFunction()
  • spoolFunction()

etc and these were cross compatible

That’s not a source.

No sources = not happening.

oh hey look what i found

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PpeVn8xullkr

Hi, forwarded as a suggestion

Doesn’t mean its been accepted by the devs, it means the mods forwarded it for the devs to look at.

And given that was more than a year ago…

hey you asked for sources, bro had enuf to convince the tech mods, that was my only aim

We don’t know what they had. If the Kh-25MT existed and was tested, its highly unlikely to have been on the SU-17’s or MiG-27’s, more likely the Su-25T/39 which was listed on the report.

We have no idea what was passed on to the devs as a suggestion, but I doubt it was the Su-17M4/22M4.

cross compatibility is the word

Sources is the other word

You have to prove its cross compatible

its a Kh-25 for gods sake.
theyre all built on the same platform

No sources = never going to happen

well ur a tough nut arent ya

1 Like

btw anyone have this book?

Reported this a couple months ago
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/l4btYztAj288

1 Like

2 secondary sources

quite enough as proof wouldnt you say hehe

1 Like

yep, saw ur report. got with dontkev and added to his list