Add rwr and increase br to 9.7 lmao
So whether there will be an increase in BR does not depend on anything other than statistics, so it is not our job. Our job is to draw attention to the missing historical features of the given vehicles, as for example, missing passive detection of the Strela-10M2.
how do you want to code that to fit the game.
Im not a dev. But for now a copy paste rwr from planes would be ok as a placeholder
1 Like
Yeah this could work.
I think it’s be unique, I’m for it
1 Like
Topic has been moved out of DEV Server section and into Macnivery of War → Ground Vehicle
1 Like
This would be awesome.
2 Likes
Do we even have the relevant radars modeled? A significant number of Strike airframes only have their radar modeled in the X-Ray view let alone those with A2G modes functional, within the BR range of the -10M2.
Sure it would be nice to have, but the other half of the mechanic(s) would be cool too.
Classic gaijin . But yeah be it through historical RWR or something along the lines of what you are proposing Strela-10M2 deserves better situational awareness .
1 Like
Atleast they could give ozelot radar without that spinning marker to strela:
1 Like
That was reported years ago (in March of 2021 when it was first added), the report was closed down on the basis of; “no, it’s correct”.
Only after numerous follow up reports and us forcing ourselves on the devs and mods about this, did they actually correct it. We had to fight tooth and nail for 2PL to get the proper resolution. Funnily, it was only really changed after we proved it to the devs that the way they think of thermal camera generations is incorrect by… pointing out 2PL and BVM have the same camera resolution in real life, yet one is 3rd gen and the other was 2nd gen in the game.
Yet its main round is still underperforming (reported in July of 2021), nor does it have the APFSDS it actually uses in real life (DM63 - also reported 2 years ago).
On the other hand, i’m just waiting for Strela to finally be moved to 10.0 :)
4 Likes
As long as the type 81 stays at 10.0 you’re going to wait for a long while
One vehicle staying at X BR doesn’t prevent another from moving to an Y BR.
1 Like
do you realize the x and y are the same in this scenario?
Okay? That is irrelevant and quite frankly you’re only trying to change the goalpost. The thread is about the Strela, not the TAN-SAM.
If you want to talk about the Japanese one, make a different thread where you lay out why it should be moved up.
1 Like
how is it irrelevant? the tan sam outperforms in every measure, so they shouldn’t be at the same br
Because this thread is once again, about the Strela and not the TAN-SAM?
We have the M1A1 AIM and 2PL sitting at the same BR, AIM outperforms the 2PL in every category but it wasn’t moved up. Your entire logic just now fell flat on its face.
1 Like
yeah and im talking about the br of the strela…
except they are quite comparable, even more now that the pl got 3gen thermals.