Id rather something unique, besides people cry so much about the T80 U that if they got rid of it people might stop crying, unfortunately thats not gonna happen and we have yet to get a TT Finnish patria…
1 Like
I have around 600 battles on the t80 and it’s one of the most enjoyable vehicles i’ve ever played. I understand why people are complaining about it because it is absolutely strong in downtiers. Got a couple of nukes with it. The difference between 3bm46 and 3bm42 doesnt matter if it’s 0.3br lower than the russian one. absolute beast vehicle to play
Were you there for the insane whining when they were gonna add DM63 to the 2PL?
I have a feeling the same thing would happen if they added spall liners :/
(I am 100% for BOTH of the additions)
The main complaint is that sweden got a trial vehicle, more specifically a vehicle they didnt need. Im of thenside that trial should only be added when no other options are available if it makes sense and if no subtree or other options can fill it. Additionally this logic needs to go to everynation. The T80 U does none of those things.
1 Like
Why even give us AHEAD if it DOESN’T EVEN WORK >:(
Idk, maybe if it was russian it would actually work
4 Likes
only things it’s useful for is the Recon Drones, which is lowkey kinda nice, they’re hard af to hit normally
PGZ09 at 8.7 with Ahead = balanced
2 Likes
Looked it up and it’s worse… it’s 8.3…what in the world
ehhh when I saw the DM63 in the br changes spreadsheet I was so excited and then it got crossed out, I honestly had no words and didn’t even care about that cause you can just clearly see that there’s no way this vehicle will get anything until gaijin changes their way of thinking. Adding DM63 to it wouldn’t make it broken or op in any way, it’s armor is really weak tbh so idk why people were complaining
1 Like
Depending on the vehicle some HEVT are spherical instead of conical which makes hitting them easier. May just be me going insane and doing better with others
1 Like
Yeah true
Yep. Currently there’s no reason to take out the 2PL instead of the 2A6 or 2A5.
It definitely needed something to push it to more playable.
2 Likes
sooooooo true
Is there anything about the litening 3 having a higher than 20km range, its annoying how it has a 95x zoom, but you cant lock any further than the older pods
Gepard (1a2) AHEAD when?
Its supposed to have it right?
would this be FnF or laser?
To be fair, the main complaint was that the 2A4M would just be a straight downgrade from the 2PL if the 2PL got DM53
1 Like