Meanwhile some russian blog site is accepted as source
6 Likes
Doubt it, wouldn’t make sense imo, it would make more sense for other 13.7 vehicles to get better radar if possible though
You do know what else was trialed along with U, right? U wasn’t the only tank.
U was an exception thats it. Leave it or else its a floodgate.
As a Puma and Vilkas enjoyeeer, I agree with your statement!
Give us more than 4!
lol true
Too late, the precedent was already made and thus can and will be exploited by “I want it”. Besides, it would be a unique variant, different from operated by Ukraine and/or Thailand
I would wait maybe one or two more days.
It’s reasonable to expect J-10B only, because of the addition of Rafale and Eurofighter.
J-10B would actually make the J-10 competitive against those two monsters.
I’m glad I don’t make any reports, seems like absolute pain
Ive been waiting months for the Finnish Sotkas (T34, both models) to get their weight reduced by .2t as gaijin copy pasted the Soviet Spaded weight one the finnish models despite them not having the add on armor. So you have a T34, with no track guards, nor track armor, so why does it weigh the same as the T34’s with the add on armor and why do i need a source to fix a problem that can be clearly scene. Regardless i added a source, a source that uses T34’s with their full armor which gets us to the base weight. Again they should weight about .2-.1t less than a standard T34
2 Likes
But Pakistan is not even a proper subtree of China … atleast dont even have a subtree line like SA, Hun or Finland.
Now you’re asking China to get something Pakistan trialed? That’s not the precedent.
Sweden is the main tree. T80 U was trialed by them. It was not trialed by Finland. Get it?
If China trialed any Leopard 2 when they were collaborating with KMW during 80s then that would’ve been similar scenario. Or if they trialed any later Soviet tanks then that would’ve been similar scenario.
Instead the Pak’s unique T-80UD is something I want to get added for China.
1 Like
Look get rid of the T80 U and give us a patria, only thing i agree with is the AHS and MI28, you find 2 vehicles to replace those and they can dissappear for all i care.
While on this I can recommend learning russian and checking RU forum, specifically the thread for Su-27SM and whole damn back and forth essays between locals and community bug reporter on the matter of flight model
1 Like
I’m thinking about what I could to convince gaijin to add a spall liner to 2PL, not like there have already been reports made on this topic and also public documents from the polish partner of this modernisation project mention it. I thought about going to my local museum where 2PLs often appear and asking the museum guys if I could sit inside it and make some photos (I already sat inside the 2PL and made some photos but that was long before I even played the game lol). Gaijin refuses to accept any source of plausible info that I’m going to shred that tank into pieces, find the spall liner and bring it to the Gaijin HQ
2 Likes
So that IS happening.
I’m not surprised.
My Cyrillic is about as good as my Finnish. Look i may consider them my brothers but they have way too many long words for something that could be shortened. (Now if everyone just spoke Danish we’d be set hehehe)
Are there plans to add the royal sovereign to the british tech tree ? It would be an easy copy and paste from the arkhangelsk and would be the most logic thing to do since it’s a british ship after all.
I wouldn’t call “happening”, just very weird standards for sources (which is everyone knows, it just Snail doesn’t have favorites - we are all equally f-ed)
There are 5 Revenge class battleships. Britain does not need the only one Russia received just because they could also get it.
AND Britain is getting Rodnol this update.
This makes my blood boil beyond belief
Why do both us and the Dutch use the barrel with AHEAD programmer if we clearly cant use it gaijin?
10 Likes
nah leave the t80u it was so fun at 11.0 before the BR changes and still is at 11.3 now