Slippery slope though, we tried and failed multiple times to make this evident, however the factor that Israel already has AGM-65Ds on the K2K is a kick in the back to a nation not struggling with stand-off capabilit except where we need it, no?
2 Likes
You will need evidence to show the F-15I can, as its a variant. Not simply an F-15E sold on.
2 Likes
One has been through a dev blog while the other hasn’t… I bet once big reports come in the gun will be gone
1 Like
At the price of removing the unique identities of trees by filling them with Soviet and American stuff.
Canada and Australia are far closer to Britain with how our vehicles act, if we wanted soviet gear like the T90 Bishima or OSA we would play USSR.
India as a nation would fit more into china due to having similar second hand soviet kit and both being BRICS countries. yes they are also a nation of the commonwealth like AU and CA but their national identity isn’t as similar
2 Likes
To be fair Gaijins implementation is a made up variant of the F-16. It’s not only different from any actually built F-16, but also quite a different plane from the proposed F-16AJ.
1 Like
And yet there were AGM-65s in the supposed israeli arsenal since the K2K existed around the time that the F-15I was purchased
@Smin1080p_WT I hate to ask if this is a possibility considering I would rather have a british option but is it possible the UK might receive in the future an Indian Pantsir? im only asking since I dont think we will see the Skysabre anytime soon
The showcased Alpha Jet is the A variant, without a gun it would be armed with air to ground armament only, so giving it a gun is a balancing choice.
The Alpha Jet TH won’t have a gun.
“How vehicles act” is not a deciding factor on where trees are placed. Neither has them being of Western or Eastern origins.
India and South Africa are no less valid in game terms than Canada or Australia.
Gaijin confirmed that there will be better SAMs being added next year. The Pantsir isn’t needed.
2 Likes
Don’t worry, you can keep india, we have no need for them outside a bonus rafale which would be nice but not necessary
India hasn’t fully received or purchased the vehicle yet.
We are working on more advanced SAMs.
5 Likes
Ok sure, but then what about the F-16C/D in the Israeli tree? They are just standard block 40 aircraft if I’m not mistaken.
1 Like
yeah and they also said more top tier ships were coming and we got the Repulse a ship that is worse in every way compared to the other 7.0s the UK has, I can see an Indian Pantsir being that “better SAM”
Woah, are you allowed to say that in here?
2 Likes
Royal Thai Air Force in this year only
- F-5A limited IR missile AIM-9B only but none countermeasures
- A-7E without guided Air-to-Ground munitions and target designator pod. But IR missile AIM-9P-4 like Alpha Jet Phase 4 and F-5E FCU ?
- AV-8S Late Air-to-Ground armament like AV-8S (Early) but RWR like Spanish Navy and better Air-to-Air Missile
- F-5T SCU Tigris airframe and engine like F-5E but very good infrared Air-to-Air Missile. battle rating would be 12.7, Air-to-Air Missile with Python 3 (stock) & Python 4
- F-16A OCU limited infrared Air-to-Air Missile AIM-9P-4 only because never armed AIM-120C-5 until F-16A ADF and F-16AM eMLU
- JAS 39C Early with Litening III pod, IR missile AIM-9M-9 and ARH AIM-120C-5
I dont know what your asking about them?
However once again, if its about weaponry, then it would be a report thats needed.
1 Like
With the same loading capabilities just lacking any of the good CAS ordinance
1 Like
Gajin working western Surface-to-Air Missile top tier in 2025, I think.
Im not arguing that they arent worth being in the game, the more the merrier. You’ve just completely disregarded that we players like the factions having their own unique playstyle, Indias modern additions throw that out the window for Britain.
1 Like