Yeah, they hid the Coelian, Panther II and Tiger 105, but kept the Panther F, which never got built either and we have stuff like the Ho-Ri Production
Is KnorneFlakez1337 derailing the thread again, not surprised.
Would recommend making a report with your evidence to support the statement. However as long as the technical possibility to mount the cannon remains and was not somehow removed, being in Thailand’s inventory is not a game requirement to be fitted. (See F-4F / F-104S AIM-J etc).
Yeah that is for sure.
It’s already powercreeped to hell so they could just yeet it in.
the leak at least said everyone is getting trenche 1s and thus none of them will have any kind of guided weapons as far as I am aware, at the same time the british did have the FGR4 which started as a trenche 1 blk5 so maybe that can but not sure
Hehe, I did think of tagging you and asking if you got the jet you wanted 😜
Yeah, not happening anytime soon
Well then, that’s what I’ll do when the dev server opens
the panther F from what I know as built, and again the Ho-Ri if gaijin can find replacements for it probably should be removed as well
Nothing was “denied AGM-65s out of spite”.
As we said, if evidence can be located that the aircraft had the ability to mount and use them, a suggestion report can be made and taken into consideration. Its down to the developers discretion to decide.
The Panther F was “completed” by the allies post war. The one we have ingame didn’t exist.
Sorry smin but this is going into the screenshot collection, no excuses for the suggestion mods to allow the lack of mavericks on the F-15I now
Its got nothing to do with the suggestion mods. It should be submitted as a historical report with evidence the aircraft had the possibility to mount and use them.
We’ve said this a couple of times now.
huh so the jury is still out on if its gonna be an F2 or FGR4 neat, I do hope for an FGR4 (not even for the CAS just so I dont have to first grind out the Tornado F3 Late)
If we have any announcements to make, it would be via blogs or the news.
So do we need evidence to prove that it is possible or that it isn’t, to make a change, because without evidence to the contrary why wouldn’t they be able to mount AGM-65s?
The Thai Alpha Jet gets a gun despite a lack of evidence it had one, but the Israeli F-15 doesn’t get Mavericks despite a lack of evidence it couldn’t, what kind of backwards rule is that?
In other words, what is the evidence the Thai Alpha Jet had a gun?
I tried :P