Stop the "Russia Feeding Ground" map design

Game Discussion General Discussion
,
42

you interviewed them to get their opinions?

43

fr

2 Likes
44

It is very simple to analyze where the average player goes.

There’s no need to interview them

1 Like
45

Go on then. Play 20 matches in a Challenger 2. Another 20 matches in an Ariete. Then play 20 matches in a T-90M.

Come back and don’t be surprised if one of those returns you significantly better results on our current maps with our current balance than the others…

1 Like
46

I merely observed their behaviour in game, which is why I encourage you to do the same. Come on. Let’s see if in any matches out of those 20 you get more people spawning B/C than A, lmao.

47

I mean he kind of is right: MOST of the time they win

1 Like
48

Now play 20 games in an Abrams and then a leopard.

You’re giving me the worst NATO tanks to play just to push your stupid agenda

49

We literally just showed you that is not the case for Russia

The statshark stats for last month are right there…

50

You said the Soviet MBTS were among the worst? Make your mind up.

You can quibble as to whether Soviet Top Tier has the best tanks - go for it. But you making it out like they are some sort of handicapped unplayable machines only kept anywhere near competitiveness by CAS (which isn’t even present in every match) is disingenuous.

…hence the sudden backpedalling in 3…2…1…

1 Like
51

where?

52

they feed very well on most tanks, you seem to think every nato player has and only uses the leo 2a7

53

Scroll up

54

alr

55

They have the best cas and sams, guess what happen when other nations got closer in with the cas (specially the us) and an got a more effective weapons to counter sams? Yeah their win rate plummet

56

so how do you know they crave instant action instead of just not understanding positioning?

57

2A7 (and equivalent) exists in 3 different NATO nations.
Abrams exists in two.
The only NATO nation with neither is France

Does every Russian player have a T-90M or T-80BVM?

58

Def not. Depends on the player using too

2 Likes
59

Russian vehicles have a low skill floor.
But low skill ceiling.

Means it’s easier for a bad player to do ok.
That does not mean it is better than an Abrams with higher skill floor and ceiling.

Simply compare a vehicle’s capabilities with another.
T-90M is lacking in almost every relevant metric vs Abrams/leopard (mobility, reload, firepower, ammo and crew layout)

60

my point is unlike all you russia defenders I remember war thunder is not just br 12.7+

61

I mean it’s armor IS WAY better than the Abram’s (in game)

1 Like