That was a fact I stated I don’t know why I would be paid for it. The company literally employs Russians and Ukrainians…
None of those sources have anything to do with the SEP v3 as far as I can tell.
I was just curious because I often see it claimed that the SEP v3 has DU hull armour, but nobody has been able to actually show me a source when I ask them about it.
Maybe it’s a case of Chinese whispers.
I never said you didn’t provide evidence, your evidence doesn’t trump what youve been shown. Which you keep trying to do.
1 Like
I love the ghost flagging system. Whats that? You have a hard truth / brutal honesty? And or a fact? flagged lmao Now Thats how you win a debate!
1 Like
If you can find an actual 5.0 sec combat load I’d like to see it.
we prolly wouldnt see anything about sep v3 armor for another 2-10 yrs
that being said, still, buff hull armor of them, which likely sep sep v2 and AIM would have best hull armor, then HC and A2, then the rest except M1
Your videos aren’t combat loads. So if you’re gonna move the goalposts, at least make your own criteria match the standards of the new goal posts.
That would make your videos irrelevant to your evidence that it should be higher.
If we have no info, don’t buff it artificially.
But as far as Abrams changes, I would like the following;
SEP v2 change ERA addons to a researchable module so they can be taken off
Buff turret ring on all Abrams to historical levels, should still be a weak point but stronger to things like autocannons
Quiet engine, this one is a must seeing as it is comically loud at the moment.
2 Likes
Fix TUSK/ARAT performance too, 0 Ke protectoon for TUSK and only little for ARAT is kinda weird consider ARAT use 2 piece ERA which is kinda decent against KE
M1 Abrams, IPM1, M1A1, M1A1HA, M1A1 HC and M1A2 all share the same hull armour.
SEP v2 is dubious whether or not it featured improved hull armour.
SEP v3 is certain to have received improved hull armour.
oh yeah i forgot mb
i think it does, i just need atleast more wet concrete
I forgot to put in this
its the 2010 WS page 16 top
left, middle info state SEP has improve frontal and side armor
sep v2 has “upgrade survivability” not sure if its all armor or sth else but thats all available online rlly
Fully agree, paper tanks and aircraft are lame don’t do it to the Abrams.
Just fix what we know is true. It’s quiet compared to the rest, and the turret ring and turret basket keeps it from auto cannons penning it.
1 Like
That just proves my point further. If you say they aren’t even though 90% are in full gear, that means it would be even slower.
The fastest combat load I have seen was about 5.89~ secs
The fastest on the move combat load was about 6.43 secs~
The total average for the videos I found was in the ball park of 6.5~ 6.8~ sec load times. Granted, only one was on the move.
And I’m talking a true reload, lock the breech, open the blast door, throw a round in the breech, slam it shut, move away from the breech so you don’t get tossed.
So there is a half truth to the turret ring armor. The lower section is covered, however the upper section sticks out about an inch of the armored plate for the turret ring in the top of the hull.
So speaking plainly, auto cannons can’t pierce the lower 1 inch or so of armor around the turret ring, but above that there is a very good chance of penetrating.
Secondly, having been stationed around abrams in my USMC career, they are a bit louder in game than they should be at idle, but driving? My god you can hear them pretty far away.
Again, what balance in that now, paper hull, turret face/manlet isnt good either. If you shoot left side turret close to manlet you die, turret ring still a weakspot, manlet still weakspot, gunner sight weakspot
it all depend on gaijin
If they buff hull/side turret armor, fix turret ring, hydraulic pump location, TUSKs buff(so they have KE protection)
problem arise when what number to give because the US prolly saw all of the document leak on WT so info are gatekeeped for indefinitely
They constantly make the remake “reloads are a balancing factor”
The only true weak point on the abrams is the turret ring. Smart players may HE the gunner optic, but that’s rare.
The breech is stronger than most others, except probably the Leo’s
its the same like others
man there is official documents contradicting the use of DU on any production variant of the M1, your solution to this its cropped parts of documents that seems very convenient, if you have the full document post it