you literally didnt see the gunners arm switch positions in one of the videos.
the video was paused and started up at a later time.
fair point
but commander can replace the tired loader, if commander tired gunner replace, after 2 of them tired loader would be relax a bit then the cycle continue
A fake 3 sec reload. As much as you say it’s real, it isn’t.
That would require a lot of “Chinese fire drills” in the tank haha
that would stinks innit
I took the time from quite literally the frame shift when the gunner is audibly reaching for the door switch and the shell. I don’t know what more you want from me.
5 secs is too fast in game.
An ace crew to be fair in game should be 5.5 or 5.75 secs
Seeing as how an ace crew is a rarity irl, it only makes sense no? You’d still have advantage over other tanks other than the Type 10.
But 5 secs is just insane.
game is just game
bug report the cyclogram program
5 sec is base on perfect condition, because crews ingame after getting hit by a 120mm apfsds shell clean through after 30 seconds revived to perfect healthy condition and continue is not how irl works
Having played all 4 of those tech trees, I would say this is more accurate:
Italy suffers >>>>>>>>> Russia suffers = US suffers > Germany suffers
All 3 major nations mostly suffer massively from braindead players (yes, Russia and Germany have a shit load of them too). Germany just has the 2A7V to carry the braindead players.
1 Like
Yeah I agree. I enjoyed Italy much more once I got my leo2a7
Freccia I was excited for but it’s hit or miss.
KF41 is just a dumpster fire.
Ariete I haven’t gotten quite yet
1 Like
2.79 - 6.6 = 3.81
Far faster than the 6 sec average. And this is a T-80 auto loader btw.
They won’t change it as 90% of the player base claims “Russian bias” or that Russia this Russia that.
I think it’s buff time since every other nation got reload buffs
Like I’m not asking for anything crazy being a 6.0 sec load time. It’s the average. It’s what it’s locked to irl. Clearly it can load faster. But being below average as is, with the BR some of those tanks are is a bit silly
2 Likes
T-80/T-64 load faster than T-72/T-90 yes
1 Like
this raise some problem
t series tank have amazing frontal armor and far far smaller weakspot than any of the tank ingame
this would make the player base outrageous because the NATO tank and abrams in game is currently(look currently) not accurate
challengers, ariete, leclerc are far from the irl counter part and alot of problems ingame
the autoloader buff would likely come when gaijin see the wr of them lower or all of the changes to the said tank are fixed, otherwise not
I dont care about your empty excuses, you asked i delivered.
Now go on and keep telling yourself its a fake.
1 Like
Lmao okay troll. Continue please, I’m getting a good laugh out of the clear bias. And the outlandish lies.
1 Like
AFAIK the abrams and Chally are relatively correct.
I’m not terribly sure about the Ariete or the Leclerc
1 Like
Says the guy who cries about Russian autoloaders.
How ironic.
i saw a video of some guy load in 2.80 seconds. like i thought this guys arm phased through the door and loaded the round.
1 Like
5 seconds is too slow tbh remember the 105abram was 4. seconds and they nerfed it.
chally isnt, just isnt
abrams have the hull armor debate(and TUSK)
ariete war kit is wrong, same with armor
leclerc idk tbh but bug report and debates say that they are wrong n people agree
NATO kit like the azur or on the chally are underperform
Because they use reload as a balancing factor.
Now people think the abrams actually loads at 5 secs when the average is about 6.47~ something from a sample of 14 videos.
Nor do I ever recall it being 4 secs. It was always 6 secs.
1 Like