Stop blaming USA top tier win rates on player skill

with links directly to dupont.com

Bit ambiguous when the diagram doesn’t fully agree with the point on the slide.
Plus GD aren’t authorised to put DU in M1 Abrams hulls.
2014-2024 Amendment:


2024-2039:
image

oh and just to make a point of spall liners for the french / british vehicles

Spall Liners | Composite Spall Liners For Military - Permali

Every British top tier vehicle should have spall liners in it.


should be lined with spall liners

the problem is that even though abrams can have spall liners, realistically the special kevlar to install in abrams weights a ton, talking about 3000-4500lbs, the US is weight concious about up to it and the side armor are sufficient enough to protect the crew inside. Abrams crews have come forward to states that there are no spall liners inside, they instead were given special spall protected vest
As for DU the M1A1 model ingame is NOT M1A1HA, the HC does not have DU in the hull, the AIM has increase hull protection tho classified, as for SEP and SEPV2 they also could have a hull protection increase tho it is more likely for SEPV2 to have DU but information are not confirm, DU weights a shit tons, DU in hull would increase the physical constraint on frontal suspension unless the technologies allowed so. In short, we dont know but SEPV3 would prolly have it

I do.

6.16 secs

11.72 secs

7.21 secs

6.54

6.06

Where’s your mythical 5.0 sec reload???

In all my years of internet debating… it was never personal. But I’ll tell you now… what I’m about to do to your stubborn, ill-informed annoying mind… I’m going to enjoy it. Very, very much.

You were saying?

Now 3 seconds reload time for Abrams when :)

The first video you posted doesn’t even show the full reload, and when he pulls the APFSDS out and puts it in its only 4 seconds

the second video of 11 seconds. DOES IT LOOK LIKE THE GUY IS EVEN TRYING https://youtu.be/Qu6EZOtwN5Y?t=71 the guy isnt even trying t put the round in as he’s holding for a second in his arms.

The third video the guy isn’t even trying to load fast. he has no sense of urgency

did you not notice how the Camera frame changed? look at the gunners arm. clearly you didnt watch the video, because i noticed that detail extremely fast.

The the last video, which is the only good video you posted the guy nearly drops the shell, the first time, the second time he loads in 4 87s

and here is my video.
Abrams tank #tank reload
image
4.4 seconds

Lmao:

Makes this even funnier:

shhhhh dont tell them!

Incorrect. The auto loader wouldn’t need a full rack for a 6 sec time load. 6 secs is the average I think you’re talking about 3bm60 not being able to sit next to one another. AFAIK, the ATGM is the only thing that has a slightly higher load time.

i’ve said it before there was a video of a russian t72 in Ukraine firing ever 4.5 seconds

i doubt that

This video has been debunked many times over.

  1. He starts with an open ammo door.
  2. He’s not in full combat gear.
  3. He’s stationary
  4. The breech block is already open
  5. He literally starts the video with his hand touching the round.

Lmao biased much?

1 Like

he’s actually telling you the truth. the russian autoloader can fire faster than it is in warthunder

1 Like

under specific circumstances
autoloader arent perfect
what they state and what happen are different

I love how you throw out random numbers. As if I haven’t timed them 😂

no, it can fire faster, just like the tanks can drive faster than they can in warthunder, there are limits put on stuff so they dont wear down faster or have problems.

Still more reliable on the move, and able usually more reliable than human loaders as the auto loaders don’t get tired.

You were asking for 5 second reload and i gave you 3 seconds.

Whether you like it or not.