What else i should blame? when clickbait an 2A5 level sit at lower BR yet drag win rate down to bottom of the abyss?
1 Like
just before playing a game say to ur tank that “you are shit” then you can get a nuke
Isn’t it? clickbait horde is main reason why US win rate is drop like rock if not because of it then what else?
idk man i just got here
just quit top tier usa tbh
Just wait, I’ll get you that ‘muh spall liner’…
By the way, the Abram’s doesn’t have a spall liner, it only has Kevlar incorporated into its Composite Armor layout, which isn’t an integral layer on the inside wall to prevent shrapnel. (For anyone who thinks Abram’s has a spall liners)
2 Likes
" PROPAGANDA! "
the abrams has spall liners, the m60a3 tts has spall liners every single m113 type vehicle has spall liners, the stryker has spall liners. the bradleys have spall liners, every single u.s military tank has spall liners
Like Clockwork.
Spoiler
As for your post:
What are you expecting? Would you use the M1A1 at top tier vs the M1A2 SEP? Not to mention Italian WRs were still amazing even before the 2A7HU.
Thanks for the false flag whoever it was.
3 Likes
Not to mention the 5s reload gives it the best firepower at top tier.
(Not counting Ariete)
2 Likes
Late response but T-80U gets Gen 1.
1 Like
In that case Type-10 has the best Firepower due to having 4 second reload time and having similar penetration capabilities.
1 Like
Fair, however it trades off literally everything else for that autoloader.
Doesnt matter, it still has better mobility, better firepower and LWS.
Both tanks either get one shot or get crippled by first proper enemy shot, in that case Type-10 is superior to Abrams in almost every way.
2 Likes
Type 10’s transmission is fucked, i’d say Abrams is better mobility wise, but this is based off of other’s opinions.
I can agree on the firepower, however my point still stands. Firepower wise Ariete < Abrams because Ariete trades way too much for that 5s DM53.
LWS isn’t rare at top tier tbf.
Lets be real here, you’ve traded bounces before. We all mess up sometimes, and if both of you mess up, the Type 10 wins. However, if the Abrams doesn’t non-pen you, you are at a far higher risk of dying compared to him.
but doesnt that just make the lack of it on Abrams a bigger disadvantage?
Type-10 still beats Abrams in terms of mobility despite not having CVT, at least M1A2 and SEP models.
I don’t talk about about Italian Tanks due to not bein true top tier contenders.
Its actually quite rare if you consider every single nation.
Both tanks can easily get one shot or heavily crippled by single proper shot, people claims Abrams more survivable but this is just myth.
Yea it can survive from first shot but usually it looses its mobility, turret ring and 2 crew members at least which basically equals to death.
It is a disadvantage yes, however, it is not the end of the world. Leopard 2’s and T-80’s do fine without it for example.
1 Like
there is one way to make it not matter though, and that is air superiority
which would be more realistic than adding LWS to abrams that it didnt have until SEPv4 which was cancelled
I’ll agree for now as I don’t have any experience with the Type 10’s transmission.
Fair.
Eh, its not rare, its just uncommon. Most nations if not all have a MBT/IFV with an LWS.
Hey its better than the Type 10 you gotta agree, atleast you’re “alive”.