In that case Type-10 has the best Firepower due to having 4 second reload time and having similar penetration capabilities.
1 Like
Fair, however it trades off literally everything else for that autoloader.
Doesnt matter, it still has better mobility, better firepower and LWS.
Both tanks either get one shot or get crippled by first proper enemy shot, in that case Type-10 is superior to Abrams in almost every way.
2 Likes
Type 10’s transmission is still messed up, i’d say Abrams is better mobility wise, but this is based off of other’s opinions.
I can agree on the firepower, however my point still stands. Firepower wise Ariete < Abrams because Ariete trades way too much for that 5s DM53.
LWS isn’t rare at top tier tbf.
Lets be real here, you’ve traded bounces before. We all mess up sometimes, and if both of you mess up, the Type 10 wins. However, if the Abrams doesn’t non-pen you, you are at a far higher risk of dying compared to him.
but doesnt that just make the lack of it on Abrams a bigger disadvantage?
Type-10 still beats Abrams in terms of mobility despite not having CVT, at least M1A2 and SEP models.
I don’t talk about about Italian Tanks due to not bein true top tier contenders.
Its actually quite rare if you consider every single nation.
Both tanks can easily get one shot or heavily crippled by single proper shot, people claims Abrams more survivable but this is just myth.
Yea it can survive from first shot but usually it looses its mobility, turret ring and 2 crew members at least which basically equals to death.
It is a disadvantage yes, however, it is not the end of the world. Leopard 2’s and T-80’s do fine without it for example.
1 Like
there is one way to make it not matter though, and that is air superiority
which would be more realistic than adding LWS to abrams that it didnt have until SEPv4 which was cancelled
I’ll agree for now as I don’t have any experience with the Type 10’s transmission.
Fair.
Eh, its not rare, its just uncommon. Most nations if not all have a MBT/IFV with an LWS.
Hey its better than the Type 10 you gotta agree, atleast you’re “alive”.
Meh, if bein alive means you cant return fire or cant even get into safe positions might as well considered to be death in that case.
I got entire Japanese tech tree alongside with US and i can easily stand behind my claim.
Not to mention Type-10 can reverse as fast as it can forward which is another advantage compare to Abrams.
My biggest issue with Type-90/10’s are gun handling, they have 30 degree horizontal and 10 degree vertical elevation speed, if they had at least 40 degree horizontal and 20 degree elevation speed they would become much deadlier than before.
I have the TKX (P) and I’d take the Abrams over the Type 10 in terms of mobility any day, the Type 10 can’t turn and takes forever to accelerate.
This feels like a long way of saying Russia suffers lol.
1 Like
Not even close, maybe 105MM can accelerate better but M1A2 and SEP models are worse than Type-10’s.
Seems like you started to showing your true colors, as i’ve expected.
Nothing but gaslighting and bein rude to other people.
Ceremony AKA @両儀_式 is not gaslighting.
Their posts are rude, vulgar, and questioning peoples’ claims. None of that is gaslighting.
1 Like
He true , now can we go back to discussing the main problem
Oh its you, now i realized who am i dealing with.
My bad, didnt realized i was talking to one of the most toxic and anti us people in this forum, carry on with your rudeness.
1 Like
you aren’t any better to call someone sht either. lol
Don’t waste your time with that toxic person, he’s famous with bein anti us and toxic behaviour to other people who discuss about US vehicles.
1 Like
Having rude posts does not mean they should be ignored.
Call them out on their posts’ rudeness, but address their points as well.
How very anti-US of them. /s
I believe HSTVL is fine at 11.7 as well.
They even acknowledged that its a bad habit of their’s to type rude statements.
3 Likes