i have 6 slots
consist of 1 spaa, 3 abrams 1 light tank, and one CAS
I wouldn’t say it’s a lineup problem, sure the US top tier lineup isn’t Sweden level of bonkers, but it’s still a deep and really solid lineup.
Excluding the premium spam/team mate debate for a little bit here. The problem that the US has compared to at least Germany, Italy and Sweden, is that they don’t really have a “carry MBT”. Admittedly I just made that term up, but what I mean with it is an MBT that is so ridiculously good and oppressive, it requires little skill to play, can just do so much carrying and can get away with a lot.
Germany has this in the form of the 2A7V, Italy has it in the form of the 2A7HU and Sweden has 3 of them in the form of all 3 122s.
1 Like
I don’t believe that 10.X Russia is THAT strong. It is strong in variety, no other nation has such diversity on helis, SPAAs, MBTs, lights, etc. yet everything is mid at worst, hence the winrates, add most of players doesn’t buy more than two vehicles and don’t have any plane to do at least CAP, similar to the Click-Bait.
But there comes the trap: Nothing is genuinely terrible, so it boils down to an attrition war. You can die as many times as you can, if you get at least one kill, you can opt to other spawn, at least repeating that min-max to 9 times given how many stuff the USSR has at that range, while most of enemies has at most, 1-3 competitive vehicles by sheer tech tree depth.
1 Like
But then vehicle quality and player skill have to make up for that. Sure more tanks more vehicle always good but cling on to that as a point of “USSR good cause it have more stuff” really doesn’t fly when we talking about a game.
Excluding event
vehicles since not everyone has them, I’d say one could argue it’s the best lineup at that BR, but at the very least it’s alright, but given the 2s38, TURMS, and T-80UD spam, you wouldn’t be able to guess it from the WR alone since those players tank it.
Lmao that’s your reply?
Yes the KA-50 is my favorite vehicle irl. Very near helicopter… so of course it’s my favorite in WT.
1 Like
I’m a Russian main, you do realize I know how to play Russian vehicles very well right?
Now, take that fact and add in the data of my vehicles, imagine if I have equal time in the leo2a7HU pre nerf. I’d probably have a 4.0 or 5.0 kd.
My abrams kd quite particularly proves you wrong in the abrams underperforming, as my clickbait is positive, but the AIM isn’t. Why is that? Stock grinding. Generally any stock grinded tank has a poor kd.
Neither do I sit back and play hull down in the abrams or the Leo. Why? Because my team never seems to do much, so I have to cap, attack, flank, etc.
1 Like
Lmao.
Su-34 costs 1034 sp to spawn my guy.
The Vihkir equipped aircraft cost 792? Somewhere about there.
1 Like
Not necessarily. Multiple mediocre —neither good or bad— vehicles will perfectly carry you the same way a couple of 2A4s, even without having to play correctly.
Compare how many event/premium vehicles Russia has compared to not only the US, any nation at that br range and you’ll discover light, it has the highest amount of prem/event vehicles. You can do a complete 10.X lineup of 5-6 prem/squadron vehicles with only the power of your wallet. The US can push for max. 4 prem/squadron vehicles, and the rest of nations usually can pull up to 2/3 (plane + MBT/light vehicle + squadron).
It isn’t about being a game, it’s straightup math, yet someone here is arguing over the skill of some individuals that doesn’t really have to do a whole lot to get results, and yet they don’t.
1 Like
Oh boy, you should do it for Italy, Israel, and France too lol.
lol this thread went to the dogs, literally.
AI had the right mindset.
1 Like
I don’t know about that.
Last time you said that you can only shoot two vikhirs at a time in the Ka 50/52, and that the AH-1Z is just as good as the KA-52…🗿🗿 🗿
1 Like
I like how you purposely left out the fact that I said I hadn’t played the KA-50 in awhile. Nice bias.
And they are pretty equal, but if the brs went 11.0, 11.3, 11.5, 11.7, 12.0
I’d say the KA-52 would be a 12.0 and the AH-1Z would be 11.7
But we don’t live in that world, and it’s off topic
1 Like
Well then, don’t say you know them very well if you haven’t played them in a good while to the point where you miss key features.
I could somewhat agree to that.
Though Ka-52 could honestly be 12.3, with most of the F&F helis.
At this point, people are talking about Su-34s and winning a bingo list of all that USA mains cry about.
I’d say I’m not that far off 😅
I’m not? I’m comparing premium players to premium players.
1 Like
Okay folks, Alvis decided to openly gaslight. Pack it up, consider this post over.
@PyroAddict 's post is now claiming/implying that War Thunder is me, and that he’s being gaslit for being told facts about the game…
Sad that PyroAddict’s post is [hopefully incorrectly] portraying them as hateful of facts…
362 / cos 60 = 724.
1 Like
Never said that, you tend to speak non-sense, and most of people here knows it. Made a personal claim about YOU.
Your facts are delusions. that 724 is an arbitrary coefficient on perfomance, not even related to mm as you’re adding cos and irrelevant operations to a number that has already been through calculations made by Gaijin, which were backed up by IRL testing of those rounds and guesstimations.
1 Like
@PyroAddict
Ironic that after you falsely accused me of gaslighting for providing a factual statement backed up with evidence, your newest post attempts to gaslight me by falsely accusing me of being mentally unwell… and you edited the post that keeps the accusation.
Your post also implies that IRL testing and mathematicians are all connected to Gaijin; sorry to burst your bubble but Willi Odermatt has no connection to Gaijin Entertainment.
I really hope you stop having incorrect thoughts about what others are and live a happier life empty of strawman fallacies.
Most people on this forum know I speak sincerely, and always speak factually when speaking on matters like this.
I agree with all people on the forum about most topics.
1 Like