god forbid someone is bad at the game
Bro complaining about statshark and gets slammed by everyone with info from statshark
2 Likes
am getting to the ratty ifvs soon on the Swedish tree. I think I can unshaft my kd. But its just too much of a deficit rn. I gotta grind 2k kills with minimal deaths
Go for Obj906/xm800/t26e5 or just go for vehicles with high fire rate and/or damage which are mobile. Gepard and its copies are also good for it.
Dw within the last year the most awful player I know has become one of the best
Tbh i dont give a shit about kd i just don’t like being made fun of. Id rather die than to play this game like a job
I dont really wanna be a good at the game I just goof off and have fun. And rant about bad takes in the forums. I do have a nuke tho so I guess that’s good
maybe get good before giving your opinion on the game? imagine that
impossible challenge
I’m garbage at grb so I just dont bother saying anything there that hasnt already been repeated by better players
maybe by 2000 games ill have green tank ss consistently
I was moreso talking abt in GRB ofc, but yeah that too
Spooks is also a good player overall, though he def cherrypicks his content
Yeah uhh dont be coming to WT to have fun
1 Like
the problem is that dying more than killing isnt fun, sadly
2 Likes
No, but is your data is just so bad that making me don’t believe you already understand how the whole ground realistic game mode works
I can hop ingame rn and get 5 kills 0 deaths if you want :)
My favorite part of War Thunder is when I hop into my Swedish 6.7 lineup and get glassed by Mäuse and IS-4Ms, but when I swap to my 7.7 lineup I get obliterated by APFSDS rounds
I honestly think 1st spawn is meant to make you hate your life too cause I consistently do better on my 2nd and 3rd spawns
Sure, but is your grammar is just so bad that making me believe you dont know English
(Apologies if you’re a non-native speaker ifc)
Yeah, statshark needs, a bit of ‘refinement’ when it comes to player skill, it shouldn’t just be ‘look at data, you bad, or you good player’ it should be an active comparison to every other player.
Nvm I know my english is is sucks🤣
From what I know, that’s the difference between Linear and Comparative rating, so it already has that
If you wanna call somebody atrocious, just hit linear stats and remove monthly and you’ll get the most biased look of all of their stats, versus the recent month (which shows their most relevant stats imo)
It’s okay lol, sorry btw
It is technically.
It has a separate absolute and comparative rating.
Like -
Green is relative position. Blue is absolute position.
My absolute position did not change since I took a bit of a break, but my relative position dipped significantly.
Same performance I went from 61% to only 58%,
You have the same thing with your individual vehicles:
0.75 KDR gives me only “Average player” in F4U-4
Same 0.75 KDR in my Cannon mustang gives me “Very Good.”
While my 1.73 in my Mustang Mk IA only gives me “Good” player.
Meanwhile in the F8E,
I have 0.95 KDR and I’m below average, while 0.75 in the P-51 makes me “very good.”
This all makes sense - F4U-4 is an incredibly good plane and my 0.75 is average.
F8E is missile thunder at premium brackets, I suck with jets and it’s easy for dedicated people to farm zombers for significantly higher KDR than 0.95.
While in props 0.94 qualifies for “Very Good” .
Meanwhile:
“Exceptional” label because I don’t flatspin the Spitfire MXVI
My favourite has to be the F4U-1A tho
I’m a Good player with 0.32 KDR in that thing?! What.
skill doesnt equal performance i think thats the issue with these things
I use statshark to compare KD and just use it to see if I’m doing somewhat good. But I think it needs some improvement like how many nukes you dropped or your average mission score.
Statshark ist Gut, aber verbesserungswürdig.