Statshark was a mistake

There are opinions that are more valid than others. For example, when it comes to skill related matters expert opinions such as those from players who consistently manage to perform well at the game should be considered to have some more weight to them than the opinions of an average or bad player since they have clearly demonstrated superior knowledge of the game by consistently outperforming others.

Yes you’re allowed to have opinions but frankly they shouldn’t be counted on for an accurate assessment of certain questions. That is all.

Just checked mine, originally when it was new and unrefined, it said I was bad, now it says average.

2 Likes

It needs to be there since a lot of players just straight up lie about something they never do and gaslight so hard that when I caught them lying, they convinced me I made it up in therapy. You can also stat check other players when in doubt to see whether their claims is true or not lol

2 Likes

hehe, purple numbers :^)

i think is great website and helps me know how i am doing, if you cannot handle competition, maybe multiplayer games might not be good for you?

i like checking statshark on people who cry about “russian bias”, surprise surprise, usually i am greeted by bright yellow or dehydrated orange, always funny to do this xD

2 Likes

caption

5 Likes

because vehicles do not use SR1 :thumbsup:

see faq here

Still insane that such a low KDR ranks me so high compared to peers.

Sure, just shows you how bad players really are.

I found the craziest pair.

image
P38E vs F4U-1D

The bmp3 is incredibly good, quite mobile, with thermals and ess, a great gun, good missiles, adjustable suspension and fairly good gh. It absolutely should be 9.3.

Spookston REALLY is not a very good player. He is barely above average.

2 Likes

How so?

Even statshark says he is considerably better than me, and I know that I’m not a bad player.

1 Like

HSTVL guy is mid
Malzi better

Stats dont lie, unlike people.

I think lot of people dont actually care if someones is pro sweat or plays for fun.

BUT if someone makes ridiculous claim without anything to back it up of course people will eventually go to check his stats. Moreso if hes acting like pigeon on chess board.

APDS is the same as found on every soviet 30mm autocannon, 82mm of pen point blank (🤮) and 100% WILL shell shatter at any and every opportunity

Mmmm, not in a game that not all people play for the same cause. Some people play a vehicle until they spade it for example in PvP and that leans to bad stats. Others may take time in PvE to get enough mods (at least good missiles and CMs ) and that might not hinder the performance as much. Also across time, when you played the vehicle and in what position it was…

For example i go ok stats in FG.1 Phantom II , but that was back in time that the plane was ok… i believe i could have way worse if i just started playing it now and in PvP without at least having good missiles and CMs.

That doesn’t need stats to prove something…you can just dissmiss his claims with data/info and maybe he understands or gets better.

But it is
Is2 is great

If You have anything to back up Your opinion, then stats don’t play much of a role.

When You don’t provide anything to back up what You are saying, it is normal that people will try to understand what made You think like that. Stats in most cases show what player is using, how he does it and how it compares to all vehicles he has.

If I make a point that vehicle „a” is effective against vehicle „b”, my own stats should reflect that.

2 Likes