4 Likes
My stats are dogshit and barely approach 2kd on my best vehicles and hardly ever get called out on it. Like the worst thing that can happen with bad stats is some loser tries to shutdown an arguement on the forums or you get rejected from a compeitive squadron, it really doesnt matter and you shouldnt care.
Caring about maintining a good kd is going to suck all the fun out of the game, and there is no mmr, no ladder, no ranked, not even a semblance of reward like titles (outside of official tounements), or anything else.
Its like playing in random pub tf2 lobbies and stroking it to your stats.
5 Likes
If you care too much about your stats you’ve already lost the game
There are only two vehicles I am trying to maintain my K/D in: the Kungstiger (cause it’s my favorite vehicle) and the Japanese SB2C-5 (cause I have a 2.0+ or 3.0+ K/D if we count all targets)
I still find fun in those, because they’re my favorites and therefor fun. You can focus on K/D and still have fun, it just takes a lot more energy
There are opinions that are more valid than others. For example, when it comes to skill related matters expert opinions such as those from players who consistently manage to perform well at the game should be considered to have some more weight to them than the opinions of an average or bad player since they have clearly demonstrated superior knowledge of the game by consistently outperforming others.
Yes you’re allowed to have opinions but frankly they shouldn’t be counted on for an accurate assessment of certain questions. That is all.
Just checked mine, originally when it was new and unrefined, it said I was bad, now it says average.
2 Likes
It needs to be there since a lot of players just straight up lie about something they never do and gaslight so hard that when I caught them lying, they convinced me I made it up in therapy. You can also stat check other players when in doubt to see whether their claims is true or not lol
2 Likes
hehe, purple numbers :^)
i think is great website and helps me know how i am doing, if you cannot handle competition, maybe multiplayer games might not be good for you?
i like checking statshark on people who cry about “russian bias”, surprise surprise, usually i am greeted by bright yellow or dehydrated orange, always funny to do this xD
2 Likes
5 Likes
because vehicles do not use SR1 :thumbsup:
see faq here
Still insane that such a low KDR ranks me so high compared to peers.
Sure, just shows you how bad players really are.
I found the craziest pair.
P38E vs F4U-1D
The bmp3 is incredibly good, quite mobile, with thermals and ess, a great gun, good missiles, adjustable suspension and fairly good gh. It absolutely should be 9.3.
Spookston REALLY is not a very good player. He is barely above average.
2 Likes
How so?
Even statshark says he is considerably better than me, and I know that I’m not a bad player.
1 Like
HSTVL guy is mid
Malzi better
Stats dont lie, unlike people.
I think lot of people dont actually care if someones is pro sweat or plays for fun.
BUT if someone makes ridiculous claim without anything to back it up of course people will eventually go to check his stats. Moreso if hes acting like pigeon on chess board.
APDS is the same as found on every soviet 30mm autocannon, 82mm of pen point blank (🤮) and 100% WILL shell shatter at any and every opportunity
Mmmm, not in a game that not all people play for the same cause. Some people play a vehicle until they spade it for example in PvP and that leans to bad stats. Others may take time in PvE to get enough mods (at least good missiles and CMs ) and that might not hinder the performance as much. Also across time, when you played the vehicle and in what position it was…
For example i go ok stats in FG.1 Phantom II , but that was back in time that the plane was ok… i believe i could have way worse if i just started playing it now and in PvP without at least having good missiles and CMs.
That doesn’t need stats to prove something…you can just dissmiss his claims with data/info and maybe he understands or gets better.