For example, getting to level 100 using only Bf109F4 or comparable 136% RP bonus vehicles -
You earn 2500 RP maximum per 15 minutes. (my last SB match, lasting almost 2 whole hours, gave me a whooping 15k RP!)
Level 100 needs 14482500
Therefore, 14482500/2500x15/60 = 1448.5 hours of gameplay.
Assuming you fly for 6 hours each week, that’s 240 weeks.1 year is 52 weeks so, boom - almost 5 years to get to level 100.
Now, let’s grab a random ARB match whose results I’d saved -
11 minutes for 8000 RP. Let’s assume I can average 8000 RP/10 minutes flying my F8U
14482500/8000x10/60= 301 hours of gameplay, assuming every 10 minutes I earn 8000 RP (which can be very plausible if I have premium and have talisman’d the F8U!).
Again at 6 hours/week, that’s down to just 1 year.
My stats are dogshit and barely approach 2kd on my best vehicles and hardly ever get called out on it. Like the worst thing that can happen with bad stats is some loser tries to shutdown an arguement on the forums or you get rejected from a compeitive squadron, it really doesnt matter and you shouldnt care.
Caring about maintining a good kd is going to suck all the fun out of the game, and there is no mmr, no ladder, no ranked, not even a semblance of reward like titles (outside of official tounements), or anything else.
Its like playing in random pub tf2 lobbies and stroking it to your stats.
If you care too much about your stats you’ve already lost the game
There are only two vehicles I am trying to maintain my K/D in: the Kungstiger (cause it’s my favorite vehicle) and the Japanese SB2C-5 (cause I have a 2.0+ or 3.0+ K/D if we count all targets)
I still find fun in those, because they’re my favorites and therefor fun. You can focus on K/D and still have fun, it just takes a lot more energy
There are opinions that are more valid than others. For example, when it comes to skill related matters expert opinions such as those from players who consistently manage to perform well at the game should be considered to have some more weight to them than the opinions of an average or bad player since they have clearly demonstrated superior knowledge of the game by consistently outperforming others.
Yes you’re allowed to have opinions but frankly they shouldn’t be counted on for an accurate assessment of certain questions. That is all.
It needs to be there since a lot of players just straight up lie about something they never do and gaslight so hard that when I caught them lying, they convinced me I made it up in therapy. You can also stat check other players when in doubt to see whether their claims is true or not lol
i like checking statshark on people who cry about “russian bias”, surprise surprise, usually i am greeted by bright yellow or dehydrated orange, always funny to do this xD
The bmp3 is incredibly good, quite mobile, with thermals and ess, a great gun, good missiles, adjustable suspension and fairly good gh. It absolutely should be 9.3.
I think lot of people dont actually care if someones is pro sweat or plays for fun.
BUT if someone makes ridiculous claim without anything to back it up of course people will eventually go to check his stats. Moreso if hes acting like pigeon on chess board.
