Tigers broke down like they were made in china though
1 Like
Actually no, that’s more a myth, Tigers didn’t broke down that much. They where designed to medium to large combat, 500 - 1500m, they didn’t broke down that much wathever, they didn’t need to do sharply movements, etc.
session ID 3b91b0c001d5e02
Me in a Raketenautomat using RPGs at 330mm pen, I have watch the replay 10 times andI still don’t undertand were my projectiles were going.
5.48 immortal MAUS
7.40 immortal Altillery
This is always happening when there are high pingers on the other end.
8KG TNT should over presure anything, lol
2 Likes
is this a joke? because youre literally using the he round not the apcbc
you are right i didnt noticed it at all , thank you
My fault was about a T-34 incident and not the KV incident before
Just saw YouTube video of a bmp dinging off a rocket like it was a spitball, what kind of nonsense is this?
1 Like
Video game nonsense, I’ve had TAMs bounce ATGMs before.
2 Likes
We had a big discussion a while about whether you could or should angle a Panzer IV like a Tiger and every came on and said " Noooo the armour is way too thin."
Since then I see both my tank and enemy Panzer IVs shrug off shots like they are wrapped in 200mm of titanium.
I have also recently become somewhat amazed by the level of “Stalinium” begin shown when facing Russian T34s and KV-1 having never believed in it. I am just sat there laughing really as shot after shot after shot is just deflecting with no effect as I fire my Panzer IV from 200mm at all those green areas the chart shows at a KV1 or T34 and see the non penetration screen
Yeah it’s always been a thing has WT physics but lately it just seems that I can only really agree with the Stalinium factor,i would be a liar if I said I had not.
I am not in any way suggesting Russian bias and I might argue that a Sherman can bounce some shots too.
Trouble is dont we all expect our armour to take a few hits? I mean WW2 heavy tanks getting one shotted by APDS and HE is a big complaint at 6BR, you cant kind of have it all ways. We love it when we bounce two or three shots and survive so think about the guy firing at you for a moment.It has to work both ways.
2 Likes
Soviet overperforming armor what a classic and special mention for soviets fuel tanks according to Gaijin they act like some kind of reactive armor and can stop every shell ingame.
unrelated but why are you carrying 48 aphe rounds
1 Like
i use to carry many shells depending on the map but very often i forget to decrease the ammo load when its not nessesarry …lol.
Actually, i shot the BT-5 3 times with the APCBC shells first shot on the turret killing one of the crew, second shot direct hit to the ammo rack with no other damage (lol!!) and third shot again on the turret killing the second turret crew…eventually the 3rd and last crew of the BT-5 was drowned and i took the kill (lol) so i guess i need many shells to deal with russian tanks lol!!
It seems that not only fuel tanks act like reactive armor but ammo racks as well
i like how every soviet heavy soviet tank fight things that are way ahead of there time and still being called “russian bais” and “Stalinium”
Ammo and fuel tanks of other nations’ tanks will do the same.
1 Like