Or because hit analysis doesn’t model internal ammo/fuel explosions ? Those explosions you see are not from ammo cooking off, it’s just from the APHE itself. You don’t need HE filler for internal ammo to explode, not knowing this is actually amazing.
3 Likes
you have right but i think that an ammorack being hit with an explosive shell and especially a direct hit the odds of not exploding are rather zero or at least should be rather zero.
Some tank have a wet ammo rack, doused in oil iirc(could be wrong so if anyone know please correct), so they have a high chance of not blowing up when being hit. Plus gaijin spaghetti code that chance is even higher
In my opinion if a shell blacks out it should explode, not just disappear. Explosion from APHE should make it go black easier, but when it reaches that status it should explode regardless.
What???
The explosion you’re seeing is the shell exploding, not the ammo. Jesus.
And I’ve posted videos in this thread before of HEAT rounds hitting the Tiger II ammo and not detonating, which by your standards should be happening.
I’m simply disproving your point by pointing out your conclusion is very flawed, due to the basic rules of statistics.
What do I have to prove? Do you want me to pull up screenshots of me saying I don’t think the KH-38s should have been added? This is a really poor twisting of words. You have the burden of proof because you are making a claim, and you need to prove why your claim is correct. If you cannot do that, we cannot say your claim is correct.
The fact you are claiming there is some magical code that makes russian tanks survive more as fact with flawed evidence and reasoning.
You are disaproving nothing…both of us cant prove our claims since we have no data as i said multiple times. Majority factor FOR ME is an indication that something is wrong and as you can see the topic title is a question (stalinium armor? ) that anyone can give his personal opinion as i did.
Im going to use an example like the kind of examples that you use… I guess that if a friend of yours tell you ‘’ i went to spain for vacations, its the most beutiful country full of sun , beaches, culture and monuments ‘’ your answer should be ‘’’ how can you say that ? How many countries have you compared as data base ? what do the statistics say , do you have the burden of proof ?.. ‘’
"I am not denying the existence of Russian bias as a whole " it sounds like a claim that needs the ‘’ burden of proof ‘’ too, based on hard evidence and statistics or we cannot say your claim is correct. Totaly agreed with you … (im not twisting words this litterally what you said)
How many times more have i to say ITS MY OPINION !! BUT on the other hand Im full of eyes to see you provide concrete proofs about your claim
Look at the simulations above , there is no comparison bettween your fiat 6614 - tiger ii shot and mine Panzer IV G - BT-5 or the Sherman 1 Composito - KV shots , in your case very few (1-2) of the ammo shells are damaged but in my cases the entire ammo rack is vanished…
Should in all cases have occured an ammorack explosion ? Yes it shoould, i agree with motorolaCRO in order of equality but if we suppose that the game takes concider the ammount of damage in the ammorack to decide if an explosion should occur or not my cases are the definition were an ammorack explosion should have occured…
Also funny to read this on a “Stalinium Armor” topic…unless you count the Russian T-V
I always read the complaints against any specific nation with a “grain of salt”…i see odd shots on ALL NATIONS…and almost everyday. And contrary to many players i see it happen BOTH WAYS. I sometimes survive shots that should have killed me…i recall a recent battle where i survived 3 shots and managed to kill the enemy…guess he complained a lot somewhere (understandably).
BTW…a admit some “odd” shots are a problem…bugs and bad design decisions do exist in WT…but others are part of the game…luck (and lack of it) happens!
1 Like
No flying turret? by the way he survided 2 such shots
On the next one a UFO lift me at 100m and my shot somehow hit him from above
2 Likes
Ahhh even if I know this convertation is futile I coulnt’t resist
We all know the dreadfull ZSU-57-2
Even thought my crew is sitting in ammo it pass clean through 2 ammo racks
2 Likes
Battle replay hit camera… hit with no damage at all …
Post battle hit simulation analysis …cannon bridge damaged and gunner , commander dead…
You hit the gun manlet , the shell could not pen such place , I don’t know how many shot did you simulate to get your preferable result but it couldn’t pen
same thing again …ricochet in battle replay
Driver and machine gunner dead at replay shot simulation…
its not a hangar armor analysis hit simulation , its the battle replay hit simulation
I don’t know what to tell you but it could not pen , even if the battle replay hit telling so. Especially when you hitting the thickest part of a tank turret
Bro gijined, As a Kv-1 Bait master, he reversed making your shell to hit the part of the Vision port that isn’t angled angaist the armor making unpenable to you
and again …hit with no damage on battle replay ( he had already 3 fatalities, only gunner and driver alive )
I should have killed driver and gunner too according to replay shot simulation
According to replay hit simulation i should have penned him