Yes, but they will never do that, because they don’t support NATO.
Freccia has 10 spikes.
Most of the other spikes IFVs have only 4 of them, they’re completely useless.
The commander sight should be able to lock anyone without any problem.
It’s the whole point of spikes missiles. You are supposed to hide behind a hill, aim with the commander sight, and shoot.
If you show yourself, there is no point using spikes.
Any manually laser-guided missile is beter than those awful spikes lol
1 Like
Gaijin doesn’t seem to care when they implement absolute OP LMURS that kill everyone with 1 single missile.
They seem to consider NATO spikes shouldn’t be OP (realistic, btw. They do it perfectly IRL) though. Strange.
1 Like
selective realism at its finest
3 Likes
They just advantage Russia over NATO, every single time.
It’s not hard to understand they don’t support NATO IRL. They will invent every bs possible to make western players miserable.
Russia has it all already, and they should get even more with FnF missiles now lol.
If they do that, there is absolutely no more reason to play something else than Russia.
they one shot me EVERY time, not critical hit, not somethimes… always one shot.
idk what you lot mean ‘need a buff’
nice ragebait
2 Likes
bro.
What game do you play man ?
Are you sure it’s War Thunder ?
@H_ngma
Yes, I know he’s criticizing me criticizing the game.
I can see that for myself.
By calling out criticizing, he’s defending the game.
If he wanted to agree with us, he would’ve said so.
Also, “unwilling” requires a statement from Smin or other community manager, or dev, that proves such a claim.
I mean yeah not surprising, mostly my own perception bias
Do you think i dont know that?
Yes i also know that but only if youre using it and have override enabled
Way more boring though
It really doesnt. The proof is there, the LMURs work, why would any other missile be modelled differently?
2 Likes
That’s not proof of unwillingness and both of us know it.
Do not discount the meaning of “proof”.
There not being proof does not mean you cannot believe in suspicions.
There not being proof does not ruin or harm the validity of your suspicions.
Your beliefs are just as valid as anyone elses’ when proof is unavailable.
For now, the reports are open, which is proof that they’re in the queue to get worked on.
You are more than welcome to suspect that the report managers haven’t updated the reports to be closed as much as you want despite that.
I criticize Gaijin for not hiring on more employees to the bug fixing team.
However, I will not say why they aren’t doing it, because I do not know their situation.
I think it should come in the form of new modifications, like with TOW missiles. That would be more interesting to implement.
Uhm no we actually do not. The reports for Spike and Pars are multiple years old at this point. The proof that they loft is there in form of training videos, actual combat videos, manuals and brochures. The LMURs came onto live with perfectly working lofting capabilites. So either Gaijin uses a different AGM model for the LMURs which is completely unlikely since everything is copy and paste with different values as shown by the doc in my comment or they deliberately choose not to give anyone else lofting trajectories. Its not a bug fixing problem, its literally changing some values. Its 100% deliberate at this point
3 Likes
@H_ngma
Lofting will be different from missile to missile, just as aircraft flight models are different.
And without proof, any other types of delays could occur, especially for existing missiles.
Juggling between editing the existing code or recreating it with a new standard.
Any number of possibilities, and bugs, could be occurring and unless a dev tells us… there’s no proof of anything.
Your post is prepared to age like milk…