SPAA J'ing out before you can kill them

That would be fine if they gave SPAA/AD weapons that can fire as far as CAS.

It’s problematic when helicopters and planes can fire from beyond render distance with F&F munitions and SPAA/AD can’t respond.

Nooooo, we can’t have SPAAs being able to fire back! How else are the poor, poor CAS players able to spam Kh-38MTs, Hammers, and AGM-65s uncontested!

Well now the Radar vehicle has maximum spawn protection for the full 15 seconds and is totally immune.

The sheer hypocrisy of this post is unreal.

1 Like

The sheer hypocrisy of CAS haters. The entire CAS hater mentality is “rules for the not for me”.

1 Like

The sheer hypocrisy of CAS haters. The entire CAS hater mentality is “rules for the not for me”.

The lack of self awareness in this post is concerning given that it is the exact opposite of this that tends to be the case.

Also entirely irrelevant to your unashamedly hypocritical post about Jing out now being acceptable to deny kills but only when it suits you.

Peak.

4 Likes

The sheer hypocrisy of CAS abusers. The entire CAS abusers mentality is “rules for thee not for me”.

2 Likes

Because using a feature for its intended purpose is bad, but abusing a feature just to spite someone cause you can’t accept that they bested you, is good.

CAS hater logic makes perfect straightforward sense.

You shouldn’t throw the word logic around when you quite literally just stated you find it acceptable to abuse J out to deny kills on runway because you’re “defenceless” (ignoring AAA), whilst vilifying Jing out in ground vehicles to avoid dying to CAS in this thread (largely actually defenceless).

Your pretence of “fair play” has gone out the window and you’ve shown your hand in this matter and your hypocritical standards based on your bias towards CAS.

Jing out to deny a kill is either okay and using the feature as intended (to leave the vehicle) or it isn’t and is abusing the purpose of it. You don’t get to pick and choose as you like.

5 Likes

Near airfield has no AAA.

Right, and? We know you weren’t referring to near airfield given you specifically referenced AAA being a mess and you were clearly talking about main airfield.

Even if we pretend for a second that you weren’t and were talking about near airfield, it still wouldn’t make your post any less hypocritical since you are still saying it’s alright to J out to deny kills in one instance and then saying it’s not in another.

And even aside from that, of course near airfield has no defence. The whole point of it is that it is a risk to land there to rearm or repair because it has the advantage of being closer to the battlefield. You’re trading a quicker turn around time for no security, but you know this already because you were referencing the main airfield and how AAA is in your opinion not very good and this somehow justifies denying kills.

I will reiterate.

Jing out to deny a kill is either okay and using the feature as intended (to leave the vehicle) or it isn’t and is abusing the purpose of it. You don’t get to pick and choose as you like.

4 Likes

The fact that you for some reason think that you get to write the rules is baffling.

The fact that you are unable to understand your double standards and hypocrisy is baffling.

I’m not the one writing the rules either, I’m only using the opinions of the GM and cited lines as well as your own reasoning earlier in this thread to point out your biased hypocritical stance.

On one hand you say that Jing out in a ground vehicle to avoid dying to CAS (which most ground vehicles are absolutely powerless against) is an abuse of the J out function and should be banworthy.

On the other hand you say that Jing out in an air vehicle to deny a kill to another plane on airfield (where you’re reliant on AAA being effective) is totally fine and acceptable and not an abuse of the J out function.

You’re using the same feature for the same reason with the same result. This is textbook “rules for thee but not for me” that you, to great amusement, quoted earlier.

If you can’t see the unabashed hypocrisy inherent between holding both these opinions then you’re a complete lost cause buried in an avalanche of your own bias.

Nothing else to add.

7 Likes

Just spawn a tank, bro

1 Like

this isnt a real issue, the cas aircraft control the narrative and they can wait it out

Just because somebody is rearming doesnt take away from the fact that they are still an active player in the game and can have an affect on the outcome of said game. They are still more than fair game for anybody that wants to come and deal with them while rearming.

So yes J-ing out on the airfield to deny a kill like that very much puts you in the same category as tank/spaa players who do it…

Trying to argue otherwise just outs you as a hypocrite in this situation

2 Likes

Using a feature - says the guy who literally struggles with TANK in TANK battles, and is only playing to spawn a plane. And if you die without enough SP for a plane you leave the battle and try another.

Just spawn a tank bro

CAS abuser logic makes perfect straightforward sense

Flag system abuse

2 Likes

Dude, you were literally trying to argue with gajin about what is and isn’t against the rules.

I have never tried to claim that j’ing out on an airfield when undamaged is perfectly fine as far as WT rules go.

Spawn a tank, bro

I have never tried to claim that j’ing out on an airfield when undamaged is perfectly fine as far as WT rules go.

You stated, and I quote:

Honestly, denying airfield rushers kills is the only form of kill denial that I approve of. AF defenses are such a mess rn, making AF camping easy, whilst giving almost no protection for people repairing.

You have said you find it acceptable to deny kills to people trying to kill you on airfield by Jing out. Whilst at the same time stating you do not find it acceptable for ground vehicles to deny kills by Jing out.

You’ve tried to claim earlier in this thread that it is abusing the purpose of the leave vehicle function to deny kills, and therefore should be a ban worthy act. Then you go on to say that you think abusing it to deny kills is fine and acceptable, when it suits you.

Same feature, used for the same reason, with the same result.

Leave vehicle, to deny a kill, removing a potential kill from an attacker who will otherwise kill you.

You are a hypocrite.

2 Likes