You’re using very subjective describing words for something you claim is objective.
You attributing “everything you can” to “enough” is a subjective opinion.
“requires malicious intent of disrupting others gameplay.” Did they leave with the purpose of being disruptive? or did they leave because their house was on fire?
Intent.
If it was considered an issue you wouldn’t be able to bring that low BR vehicle in the first place and there wouldn’t be an achievement for getting a kill with it.
It IS subjective.
No kidding, but the thing is, they’re not even playing lawyer. They are playing semantics. “Actually you didn’t say this, therefore you’re wrong, I’m right, hardee-har-har.”
And I thought you were annoying when you tried claiming air on air eliminations counted as SPAA eliminations. Then again, it could have been some other weirdo, but I’m 90% sure it was you.
Not doing everything you can basically collides with griefing/unfair rules.
I thought that was pretty much set in stones because those rules exist, I guess not.
And you gonna prove that intent how, by using your crystal ball that tells you things ?
Other PvP games would just apply a cooldown after you’ve left the game, which is perfectly fine even for those that have their house on fire as they wouldn’t even be playing in the next 10-20 minutes anyways.
You’re basically protecting malicious acting which takes up like 99.99% of such cases just because of those other 0.01% where the leaving might actually be reasonable. Bottom line is, them leaving the game is disruptive to the game, be it malicious, intentional or not.
Not everything has to be intentional or malicious to be punished.
If it wasn’t considered to be an issue then BR system wouldn’t exist at all as it only hurts the queue times with no added benefits.
I mean, why bother segregating and maintaining all of the vehicle’s BRs if it’s deemed to be perfectly fine to see L3 fight a bunch of modern day MBTs ?
This is just an added workload without any real reason.
So if I don’t know how (and who) to contact, how would I raise my concerns about issues like these ?
Because it hinders higher BR to be brought into lower BR match, not the other way around.
Reports if it’s isolated instances ( How to properly report players and contact Game Masters! ). The forum to voice an opinion on regular occurrences and larger scale issues not yet addressed. Then Community managers (and others) forward concerns where noticed and deemed appropriate to do so.
You literally do as proving the malicious intent behind someone just leaving the game after his death can’t be done.
As I also already said, not all actions need to be malicious or intentional to issue punishments. What you’ve caused with your action definitely should and can be used to dish out punishments.
Can you tell me why do you want to stop higher BR vehicles to be brought into lower BR games, is it maybe because those engagements would be unfair to players ? It’s actually funny how the story basically writes itself.
That said, if you don’t want higher BR vehicles to be brought into lower BR games, then it’s logical to stop people from bringing lower BR vehicles into higher tier games as the end result will be literally the same.
The end result: Reserve tier vehicle fighting 12.0 one.
By intentionally putting yourself on a back foot you’re doing the same to your random teammates as well, which goes against the spirit of fair play, am I right ?
There’s a clear logical connection there if your goal is stopping unfair engagements from happening.
You choosing to be the underdog would be fine if happening in a PvE mode, but we are talking about a PvP mode where you have 15 other people to think about, so you doing the “underdog” will mess up with their experience as well and all of that is been done with intent to top it off.
I don’t know how you still can’t see that purposely trying to be the underdog in a game like this basically goes against the spirit of fair play.
This is like you’d play games in CS2 with nothing but a knife and for your excuse you’d use “Sorry bruv, I’m just trying to be an underdog” argument. I guess that it doesn’t matter you ruined their experience, griefed them and broke the spirit of fair play.
Everything is allowable if you want it, who cares about other random strangers that haven’t signed up to your shenanigans, right ?
Clearly none. I apologise I had to photograph it, my Xbox is not allowing me to screenshot at the moment. Classic Microsoft, “we cannot save at this time” bollocks.
Your reasonable doubt doesn’t count as a concrete proof of malicious intent behind someone leaving the game. A player might just learnt about his house being on fire or that someone is burglarizing his home so he left the game right there on the spot.
99.99% crashing on purpose or 0.01% of random disaster that just so happened to specifically happen at this time of year, at this time of day, in this part of the country, localized entirely within your kitchen?
Yes, you need to prove it being malicious beyond reasonable doubt.
Other games dealt with this impossible thing by just applying penalties to all people that leave the game prematurely, as each leaving impacted the game in a negative way.
