Just because SPAA is “meant to be dealing with them” doesn’t entitle SPAA to free kills.
SPAA being more powerful requires SPAA costing more. That’s just balance 101.
1 Like
lol.
Nobody cares about making stats.
Me Spawning OSA at that moment
xD
1 Like
Ok, stop crying. Is not the SPAA problems, is the BR itself got huge problems.This BR range is f up by Gaijin’s decompression, so is normal to see this many weird stuff at this BR range
Topic Cleaned
@Beeschurger @Pangolin_Fan Guys please do not spam the topic with stat shaming and personal disagreements.
If you wish to keep going, use DM’s instead.
Thx.
4 Likes
no problem chief.
1 Like
Wow, a cool mode? I wish I saw you more often.
1 Like
Soooooo… I’m still curious, How do ppl suffer from Cold War CAS? Even adats feels fun considering 11.7
1 Like
Friendly reminder why is the shilka with missiles still a 9.3 vehicle?
1 Like
Why shouldn’t it be?
Because finally getting missiles at 9.3 is a slight breath of fresh air relative to the rest of the spaa up until that point save for 2 previous that are “good”
Because 1980s SAMs should not be facing 1940s and 50s planes.
Its a pretty useless missile, cant lock helis and wont hit anyone going over 600kmph that slightly turns, stingers are much better, but still in that same realm of being pretty easily kinetically dodged.
You are basically an 8.0 spaa with a skill check missile.
The other downside of the shilka being poor gun velocity limiting their kill range compared to other 9.x spaa.
It should not be facing 8.3. Planes like the B-57 and F9F-8 (yeah I know both are way overtiered for 8.3) cannot dodge the 4M for the life of em. Even in a headon pulling as hard as possible with roll, there simply is 0 way.
70sp vehicle should not have advantage over 600sp vehicle.
1 Like
which 600 SP vehicle? The ones that they are completely outranged by or the ones that can wipe four-five people in a matter of seconds? You want SP costs to go up for what reason? so you can spawn kill a team even faster with bombs?
1 Like
The ones which are outran by some WW2 props, can’t even pull 8gs (or can only do so for a couple seconds b4 losing all speed), and have 0 ballistics computers whilst being put up against 1980s SAM and radar SPAA.
They are so damn easy to use???
So what? Ease of use doesn’t make something good, and the vehicles that have em are overtiered now.
Ok? By that metric, the LAV AD should be 9.7 or lower then. The only difference between the 2 is speed and slightly more gun performance. Any non manually guided missile should be a lower BR and any auto track missile should be a higher BR. 9M39 outperforms the FIM missile easily even with it being uncaged.
K variant has a 1m proxy fuse which is a gigantic advantage, uncaged seeker, is faster by like what 15%? I don’t get an s80 rocket pod on the zsu, and you dont get to gokart around the map in the zsu its painfully slow, and the second you run into anything that isn’t made of paper you die.
The fact it sits .3 BR higher than the gepard with the same missile, which is a monster on the ground should tell you something.
The only thing the zsu has over it is a radar, which is only useful for not having to check the airspawn every once an while if you keep it pointed there, its not like the radar on the gepard that gives you 360 constant situational awareness.
SPAA being able to play ground matters a lot, there is no where to hide on these small maps and I’m pretty sure I die to tanks more than CAS in pretty much every SPAA, a lot of people are going to be experiencing that in these new SPAA that are just fat sitting ducks, at least in the pantsir I have some chance with the guns to defend myself these new ones can’t do jacknothing.
2 Likes