It’s quite fun. In addition, I am getting better at photo editing.
From dev server or live server ?
But MiG-29MLD never access Kh-29T ?
You guess dev consider new lightweight 4th gen fighter or early eahvy 4th gen fighter aircraft rank 8 for japan tech tree in october or december this year ?
I disagree here. We were expecting F-16C maybe December at the earliest going by Gaijin’s usual pattern, but to see it earlier means we’re speedrunning Gen 4s. Now we’re guessing F-15s and Su-27s by December. I think you even mentioned they’ll be here in Oct which, if true, would mean we’d leapfrog yet again for December as December is usually the biggest update, between the two.
So an IR limited XF-2 or F-2 could be given its full loadout later and moved up right? There’s already a precedent for this.
Not sure how that’s relevant when we just discussed aircraft that did not receive their full armaments on release.
You have no idea if the F-15J will release with AAM-4s or not so you can’t say they’ll come with full armaments. Again unless you have a statement from Gaijin that says it does, pylons being filled or not does not matter.
You got any documentation for that? I’m curious myself but unless there’s evidence to the contrary, we can’t just assume it can do magical things.
2 Likes
How do you come to that conclusion?
The F-16 was leased to Italy and Israel bought it. The Italian and Israeli F-16’s are still American jets with multiple US laws still applying to them in foreign service.
American means they wered designed in the US.
The KF-41 was bought by Hungary, which is in the Italian ground tree, which means that’s where the KF-41 should be, just like the Italian and Israeli F-16s
If you want we could even use the F-4F as an example of an “American” jet that the US tech tree doesn’t and shouldn’t have.
Just like the KF-41 is a “German” IFV that the German tech tree doesn’t and shouldn’t have.
1 Like
no no no no no no no
MiG-23 with R-73 and R-77 can’t come before F4F ICE
trying to spade my dad’s plane can’t be made so hard that I’ll have to play idk Stardew valley to calm down after every match
the majority of F4Fs were build in Germany by Dornier
Who said mig-23-98 will appear in this patch?
Maybe in the next one. For now it lies in the files
then we must remove it from the files and replace it with Gnat
you sure they weren’t manufactured by McDonnell Douglas and just assembled by Dornier, because nothing I’ve seen suggests the Germans built them and generally describes them as exports.
Well, I can only say if you met me earlier, I would’ve given you plenty of reason that ALL non-AESA F-16s are addable the moment F-16 Block 15 arrived.
Just as I will tell you once F-15C arrives, all non-AESA F-15Es are addable.
Just they won’t be right away because Japan doesn’t use the E and F-15E requires more dev time than the Cs.
It’s clear that the IRCCM test is occurring before the ARH test which I admit I was drastically incorrect on my prediction. So ARH comes October/December in full force, with 9Ms/AAM-3s on F-15s to have as they cannot have AMRAAMs at the same time as the gen 3.5s & light gen 4s for balance reasons.
And next year we’ll see later gen 4s including as options F-2, F-16 Block 60, Eurofighter, Rafale…
I’d agree with you on XF-2 if it could have 8x AIM-9s, but I don’t think it can.
I’ve heard it can only have 4, but I haven’t seen evidence one way or the other.
And no, I have a solid idea that F-15J will release without AAM-4s. F-15J is 1981, and AAM-4s are 1999, with AMRAAMs at 1991, on top of that, the BR maximum is 12.3, maybe 12.7, that’s not high enough for advanced ARH carrying heavy gen 4 fighters like Eurofighter, F-15, and Rafale, and it seems in-line with what Gaijin is planning based on the confirmations and additions this year.
the almost 640…
The Abrams doesn’t use Chobham armor. It uses armor developed by the Ballistics Research Laboratory. The XM1 prototypes used Chobham, which is why the turrets are more heavily sloped, but the production armor wasn’t Chobham.
1 Like
The F-4F is a American jet of course. Never said that the KF-41 should not be in teh Hungarian part of the Italian tech tree. But here again the F-5’s in the US tech tree have fantasy countermeasures. The F-4F early never had the misisles it has in game etc.
Compared to many other vehicles KF-41 would be a reasonable disussion ignoring for now wether or not it is necessary.
Lmao this is why I don’t take crying mains seriously
Even if it would be license production with various changes perhaps. Still makes it an American jet.
Here’s the thing though, once the Puma gets Spikes, the KF-41 won’t be needed in the German tech tree, which means right now it isn’t needed in the German tech tree because Spikes have already been confirmed for the Puma some time in the future, all that’s needed is a little patience instead of this knee jerk reaction over the KF-41.
But it doesn’t belong in the US tech tree and I haven’t even seen anyone really asking for that to be a thing even though it is exactly the same situation as the KF-41
Where are you coming from?
Wether it is needed is beside the point. Puma is not relevant to the fact that a vehicle designed by Rheinmetall could of course end up in the German tech tree no matter if it was procured by the German goverernment for it’s own armed forces or by whichever country bought it.
That is a point that does not require any discussion either. Seeign some of the vehicles in game you will see that sth. such as that could easily happen if Gaijin would like to make it happen.