Yea I did
1 Like
Intresting, don’t forget about the vickers mk.3 Kenya and Nigeria used it and stil haven’t got the proper flags
Im not directing this at anyone at all this is just a general realization, I understand the British players are mad to get the T90S right, and that yall need a light tank way more, but its funny to me that the same people not wanting the T90S in the UK tree are the same people who would complain if it went to Russia instead.
Again I reiterate this is directed at NO ONE.
Im going to regret posting this but I wont delete it.
Who would complain if it went to russia? I dont think ive seen anyone who would dissagree with that at all. It should be a russian sqn vehicle, we dont want it.
1 Like
You see the problem with that is it was always going to Britain but if it wasnt people would be very upset.
Says who? We dont want it. It doesnt fit in the british tree. Its not a western tank, has no real ties to britain and does nothing to fix the flaws gaijin have created in the tree. Why would we care if someone else got it?
Were this not the case (still is) for the ussr lmao
Idk, protect the crew from chemical shells I guess, it isn’t that small actually)
There is a description:
Spoiler
Two variants of the Hungarian ERA:
SZRP-L (which is lower in height, smaller one), at 0 o it reduces the penetration to 40% (800mm or less penetration), at 45 o it reduces penetration to 15% (800mm or less penetration)
SZRP-N (bigger one, normal thick one), at 0 o it reduces the penetration to 20% (800mm or less penetration), at 45 o it reduces penetration to 5% (800mm or less penetration)
Hungarian Ground Forces
1 Like
Like I said if it was originally going to Russia people would not be happy at them getting ANOTHER MBT.
- Red Top air-to-air missiles : Guidance : IR Seeker :
- FoV : 4 → 2°
- Max Lock Angle : 20 → 30°
More flare resistance and bigger lock angle?
5 Likes
@Smin1080p Sorry for the ping,
Are there any plans currently for the Chinese MLU to receive the more advanced capabilites it had irl? LITENING pod, AIM-9M, Mav Ds etc?
5 Likes
I haven’t really tested the R-27T seeker on the dev server yet but from what I’ve seen it also looks a lil more flair resistant, but I’m not sure
After seeing the MatAWG video about the phyton 4 I have to say: Give Phyton 4 for Barak gaijin!
3 Likes
It already got AIM-9M
4 Likes
I’m not just mad about the T-90 it’s just gaijin policy on Britain as we clearly can’t have nice things and consistency.
Hell we still using the Phantom while Russia and the US are at there 2nd F-16X and Mig 29X variant stage
1 Like
Yeah but now I want Phyton 4
1 Like
Oh for sure I defnitely agree Britain is WELL overdue one of its MANY light tanks that shouldve been added by now.
Hell one of my mains is WELL overdue a new SAM we’ve been using the Type 93 since 2020
2 Likes
Depends on the speed you launch the missile. What speeds are you launching?
The thrust vectoring cannot go completely active with free mobility at high speeds because the missile will lose control. It is literally pushing the missile contrary to the forces that keep it in stable flight. The R73 is not an intercept missile, just as the R60. Not Ideal for supersonic launches. But more for high aspect close range air defense.
Regardless I do think the R73 can use a little more turn radius at slow speeds at close range. But the R73 is still on a better path to realism than it was on dev drop.
2 Likes
kf41 Still no modifications have been made
found a pic of JAS 39-2 (second prototype Gripen), with IR-OTIS HMD equipped.
2 Likes