There is also domestic variant with ERA:
what exactly is that Micro sideskirt supposed to do?
Excellent, glad to see the AIM-9M performing realistically.
Britain IS the most practical place for any australian vehicle. Australian vehicles are in the main brit tech tree already. Royal australian navy ships are in the main tree and RAAF aircraft are in the british air tree. Australia is a british realm, this is a direct political tie. As ive said before Australias defense force swears allegiance to the crown and our vehicles are property of the crown.
Bruh
Yea that’s what I don’t get.
Hungary can’t be everywhere because they been in Italy for years.
While the same are said for Australia but no they can go anywhere now.
Because we said so
I fear we are gonna get an half Indian line in the export line
Could be anything mate, as long as the british player base dont want it, its not a western tank, no real connection to britain, and preferrably russian.
Protects the side of the tank.
@Smin1080p Would you happen to know if the J-7E will be receiving it’s updated physical model along with the corrected RWR in this major update?
This is the report I made that ended up correcting the RWR.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vdiwAb1gM5Ik
I need to re-read Smin’s comments and the T-90 blog as this makes no sense as to why we are getting exports MBT from SOME commonwealth nations.
Can you lot help me find some of his comment’s on this ?
Apart from being a British colony, the Indians had nothing to do with the British. Will the next century vehicle be the Sino-Pakistani JF-17 Thunder/FC-1 Xiaolong on the UK tech tree? (Pakistan was also a British colony.)
The way it’s worded we are only getting MBT’s
Australia had leopards, m1 and now m1a2 but they arent russian so they will go to the american and german trees.
But yea like I’ve pointed out the two odd conflicting reports and other have pointed out that the UK have 100% rights to have Australian tech over India’s tech
my guy makes a good point: ‘‘As happy as I am for AIM-9M’s arrival, I would still like to point out that double standards in regard to its implementation still remain. I would like to ask for AIM-9M to be treated more similarly to R-73: stock and without AIM-9L in the way, the same way R-73 is stock and without R-60M in the way’’
Ive had this discussion with Sm1n before. Its disrespectful and insulting the way they treat Australia and Canada when it benefits one of the top 3.
Da comrade, is fair and balanced
As you mentioned abput india fighting to seperate politically. Australia on the other hand voted to stay british subjects with the monarch as head of state.
Yea plus we have already got 10 Aussi vehicles from them in our tree.
Hell if we apply the AIM logic we shouldn’t have the Wirraway as it was based on the NA-16
(WHICH BTW IS BASED ON A AMARICAN AIRCRAFT !) but yea it’s rotten behaviour.
If i remember rightly the 2nd short sunderland was an australian upgrade too. Did ypu onclude the beaufighter and mk21 beaufighter as well?