It’s actually true. When they tested the F-16C against the German MiG-29A 9-12A in 1991 for example, do you think they were calm after the results?
The Russians outclassed them in many areas of weaponry at that time.
All Hungarian KF41s produced are equipped with StrikeShield APS integrated in the additional armor on the sides of the hull
This is gaijin’s discrimination against Italy
na they were only scared of R-73
to grind the LGBs in air RB. plus i meant for TOP TIER
Moron RU and USA mains pointing at each other, justifying the obvious bias.
“Look USA is getting a buff, Russia needs something!”
“Look RU gets x any y, we need a buff too!”
Meanwhile all minor nation players just forgotten.
Like how they just ignore the obvious fact that Gaijin favors RU and USA and shits on minor nations.
6 Likes
5 Likes
yea won’t even get F4F ICE at a time where it’s already outclassed
so true. i see a slight preference for russia over USA but srsly we should set this aside and pressure the devs to care for the minor nations altogether
how are you able to keep up with this topic?
definitely DOA. germany suffers unironically, at top tier air
Please can you explain exactly how the F-16C is added to the game and Israel still doesn’t have any top tier BVR?
3 Likes
or how the only BVR Sweden has are 2(!) AiM7E2s
The MiG-29’s high speed performance, turn rate (although in a prolonged rate fight the F-16 had an advantage), HMD and R-73 is what scared them, it wasn’t only the missile.
2 Likes
Still better than Israel, and they just added an aircraft Israel could use that fixes the issue.
unless they give the German MiG-29.the same upgrades.as the SMT has it definetly will
1 Like
Right and yet they are completely fine adding a MIG with R-73s and good R-27s but sparrows to that aircraft is a sin apparently
1 Like
DOA just like many of our evil minor nation “tOo GOod tO bE aDdEd” jets according to the mains
1 Like
You are beating a dead horse bro
Ah yeah the topic where you were arguing that the R-73 with insane flare resistance was fine because we had to “learn” to dodge them kinematically. Totally not a schizophrenic take.
By every metric available to all of us yes it is an actual legitimate way of evaluating the performance of US aircraft because all you can do on the other hand is sit and talk about how many Gs this pulls and how much AoA this aircraft can make by reading stuff you don’t actually understand because in the end you are neither an aeronautical engineer nor a fighter pilot so your opinion is as good as John Smith’s on Quora.
Yeah sorry I don’t have to go into theoreticals because the K/Ds are proven records, something you and your precious russian “smarter” buddies lack.
on the topic or 27s with the ET did we just get our first medium range FnF missiles?
1 Like
Don’t the 24T and 27T already fill that role?