Have you seen Sweden’s CAS?
The KA-50 and KA-52 are the best helicopters in the game
The F-16 has much less A2G ordinance than the MiG-27 which again limits it’s effectiveness over a full match especially as Maverick B’s are pretty bad
And the Russians have the Pantsir which is universally accepted to be the best SPAA
What does bro mean
I dont see why people think the ka-50 is that good in ground rb. The ka-52 is a whole another story
Ok, got it . Another terrible spokesman of worst USSR vehicle, that only needs to be upgated.Then countinue discussion is useless…
2-2.5 depending on elevation. 1.8 if you believe the USNTMJ, but they had trouble with every other part of the ship so even that’s questionable.
American battleships are all ~1.5 give or take depending on gun crews and other circumstances.
Pantsir cannot hit targets, so no it’s not the best. TOR-M1 is the only great SPAA, everything else is currently average until I see proof of them hitting maneuvering targets.
Ka-50 is not the best 11.0 in the game and never will even be top 5 even. Use to be OP, but that was years ago.
And Ka-52 is on-par with Apaches. Much to Russian mains’ “BUT! Proxy 650mps!” I’m honestly done with people claiming Ka-52 is the best helicopter in the world just cause it has fast proximity ATGMs.
SPAA will still kill them.
And yes, Sweden’s CAS is barely “worse” than Soviets. I say “worse” cause 4x Mavs is okayish, same with 4x GBUs is okayish.
dude is comparing a fighter to a fighter bomber
2x?
1 = F-4F ICE
2 = ???
Why?
It’s not at the 12.0 maximum right now because its flight performance holds it back, no reason to expect it will ever be at absolute top BR regardless of its armament. Unless that is it gets the armament upgrades ahead of everything else, which seems more than a little unlikely.
pantsir, while having autotracking, cannot hit targets without the missile going wild or simply running out of energy, youre probably the type to fly straight then say stupid pantsir killed me
Its on par only with the AH. Mk1 which is UK
Anyway, back on topic- final proof that the Gripen “screenshot” is fake: that’s the whole source pic.
Ok in that case the US’s best CAS is an A-7, does that make the comparison better for you?
I mean it hardly matters anyways, we have confirmation that it is coming this year so either Gaijin lied which is entirely possible or it’s coming within the next 4 months anyway
2nd is Mig-29G.
Weapons increase BRs, regardless of flight performance.
A-5C is 10.0 exclusively because of Magic 1s, otherwise it’d be 9.7 with 9Js, or 9.0 with nothing.
13.3 won’t be absolute top BR.
@BearHasLanded
It’s coming regardless cause we’re on the cusp of 12.3.
F-15Cs, Gripen, F-4F ICE, etc.
MiG-29G is no different to the MiG-29A in terms of gameplay though
Correct, but it can be the R-73 carrier so 9.12 can stay 12.0.
So what BR are you putting those aircraft at, specifically the MiG-29G, F-4F ICE and EF-2000?
Correct many use the History of Korea as a way to explain why it won’t work but even without political issues it would be illogical (more then F-16AJ). The current subtrees at least have somewhat connection to the Tree they are in, South Africa purchased British vehicles and even Sweden joint developed some vehicles with Finland. Also an fun fact is that Finnish Air Force first aircraft was donated by Sweden.
However if people are willing to give South Korea to Japan even thought it’s illogical then this same way of implementing should be allowed for any other nations which means random nations can be added random in-game nations in-game.
Medium and LT line will contain familiar vehicles in-game but the SPG and AA line mainly contain of domestic and homemade modifications from North and South Korea, so you have a mixture.
A variety of Pattons and Chonma’s which later models have been extensively modified (something you didn’t mention or wanted to mention) like many other vehicles in-game, not to mention that the T-54/55 and Type 59 also received slat armor something we don’t have in-game.
If the numbers bother players then Gaijin can folder them as they planned to do so with other nation and also can simple add 3-5 of most are modified.
Visual Tree by @spamanator500
What are these similar equipment then the M24, M4A3(76), MIM-23 or the MIM-104? South Korea has adopted different types of equipment from different nations (vehicles/air) that Japan does not have or even used the technology from several different countries which resulted in the K31 pegasus, KUH-1, LAH, KM-SAM
Even the K2 while having the same mindset as Japan for mountains terrain it still share more similarities to the Leclerc then the Type 10.
