@Volxar
thats not my point, you said i cant have a “prejustice” because its unfinished, so then why did people do exactly the opposite when it was on dev?
and if hit with the truth(that it was unfinished) theyd just ignore it and keep saying its gamebreaking etc
because it still will get massives buffs and it is already doing over the shoulder shots
3 Likes
i know, i saw it
so why do you compare it then to the dev servers if you already know it is different?
yea over the shoulder shots which can be deflected with one flare
nagato have around 1.5-2.5 shoot per minutes, so its close to american
why should i not if others can
u make no sense, like always i will ignore you again
Nagato’s closest counterpart would be a Colorado-class, but it seems America is far from getting anything like that anytime soon, unfortunately, and will probably only get it once it’s too little and too late.
Strv 52% but in what ratio of matches played 1:2 vs Russia
no the data would generally show the efficacy of the vehicle over the player behind is a outside of a few isolated instances you can pretty much assume overall player skill is equal, I have no desire for the Soviet tree to suffer, and using squadrons will make anyone’s stats look better as teamwork is both incredibly important and also rarely taken advantage of in an average match.
The reason the soviets tend to do so well in ground battles is that they have the best combination of AFVs, helicopters, and fixed wing CAS. Now don’t take this to mean they are the best at everything, they are just very good at everything which cannot be said about other trees.
Take Sweden for example, sure they have arguably the best tanks in the game but look at their CAS options, the AJS-37 is the best they have and it is terrible. Germany as well, while the ASSTA1 is decent it suffers from a severe lack of maneuverability which limits how effective it can be over the course of an entire match. Russia does not suffer at any one of these points and while yes they may be outclassed in some individual aspects they have a very well rounded lineup with no particular weaknesses. That is why Russia wins.
4 Likes
Gaijin gived us sharnhorst without counterpart for a while, so… they can give us this and it have looong reload
that doesnt help you, if you have double the amount of matches is russian vehicles, it makes it more impressive and shows that russia is stronger
1 Like
That video doesn’t prove anything, and citing that video proves you’re posting misinformation.
BVM came out months to years after equivalents were in other tech trees.
Mig-27K came out months after equivalents in 5ish other tech trees.
Which means all tanks armor is over-performing, because of this one fact: 1.25 multiplier on all modern tanks RHA.
@BearHasLanded
No, Thunderskill shows the general skill of players, not vehicles.
We know BVM is not the best MBT in WT, it’s not even top 3. Thus any exceeding stats involving it is player skill differences.
USA does. Sweden does. Soviets do not. They have 1 MBT to do stuff with, after that they have a helictoper that’s shot out of the sky by good ADATS players, or a CAS that you need really good eyesight to see anything with and can get yeeted with an F-16 same as everything else.
Use it on 60% wing sweep.
The only reason Soviets would win is because of team skill.
3 Likes
Linking TEC and trying to improve your arguement at the same time is an oxymoron
2 Likes
Rush on enemy is a skill? I don’t think so…
2 Likes
yes
rushing the enemy and not dying is skill
2 Likes
unfortuneatly hes right, no matter how much i like him
you can also ingore my argument and the prime example he gives with such a dumb statement
everyone chooses the easiest way ;)
1 Like
Clearly it’s working against people more than it’s not according to you.
Learning how to defend against blitzkrieg is a valuable skill.
@SPANISH_AVENGER
Way to post a strawman fallacy. You Russian mains…
If ANY playergroup does better in equivalent vehicles it’s down to player skill, as I said previously. Stop making up arguments no one has ever said.