More interested in when the next economy updates are coming tbh. Hopefully not until August till we get some RP economy improvements.
I don’t want to speak for Gaijin, but I can bet you GE that Rafale, in any variant, is still far away, and will definitely come after the Gripen.
1 Like
No GE milan :(
Yeah Gripen A is mid 90’s and earliest Rafale is 2000’s with a lot more capabilities included limited, but pretty darn good, RCS reduction.
But Hungary already to be confirmed to be in itay. Majors cant have sub trees as they cant have more then 5 lines. Gaijin said the Turkish market is important to them as it brings even more players from that region. So what better to do than to add Turkey as a nation. So it can bring a whole load of new Turkish players.
FYI, Will be suggested under the Ukrainian Ground Force Tech Tree suggestion topic.
I guess early 2000’s maybe Rafale M LF1 from french navy, retrofitted 30mm GIAT 30M971B cannon, limited infrared AAM & ARH BVRAAM but without Air-to-Ground armament and OFS (Front Sensor Optics, which include the Camera, Laser range finder and IRST)
Doesn’t seen like anyone else mentioned it: https://youtu.be/wIla0DZ8kRE?t=714
Yesterday 's episode of The Shooting Range, by gaijin entertainment reconfirms that new top aircraft are possible and planned, though no timeline can be shared atm. This was specifically in reference to a question abt the possibility of the Eurofighter Typhoon, F/A-18 Hornet and F-15 Eagle being added.
The show also stated plans for a segment showcasing 4th Gen fighters, to run once more of these have been implemented.
One of those is the Gripen.
What other 4th gen can we realistically expect soon?
F-15? Su-27? Early variants of course.
I have the F-4F ICE in my Mind
1 Like
“So what better to do than to add Turkey as a nation.”
add another country as a nation?
1 Like
Just because a market is important doesn’t mean they’ll just add any nation. India is a much larger market and they’re getting relegated to a sub tree within their former colonial masters.
Plus it’s not as if Turkey’s market is actually that large given the state of their economy, and again using the same argument, India is a far better candidate for a unique nation since they have unique vehicles too.
1 Like
And again the C&P argument isn’t valid as there is C&P everywhere now.
USA : 7
Germany : 38
USSR : 20
GB : 12
Japan : 21
So if countries that have a large number of C&P shouldn’t be added then way should the majors have them as well ? Or it it a case I don’t care about then because people can skip them ? Or don’t have to play them if they don’t want too.
Why should it be one rule for majors and another for everyone else ?
3 Likes
Congratulations, you just made an argument on your own because you just want to discuss your own agenda.
1 Like
I think that can be overcame
For IDK which time, if something is doesnt mean there will be/should be more of that, great example of that is F-16AJ
it’s not about the number of C&P vehicles, it’s about their proportions within a tree.
a tree with 100 vehicles and 10% of C&P has more copy-pasted vehicles than a tree with 40 vehicles and 20% of C&P, but it feels more unique because the proportions aren’t the same.
minor nations will have less unique vehicles and that’s fine, but it’s not a justification for trees with 60, 70% of C&P to be added
Aye, by adding more tabs with in the nation yea now we know that ground can research helis soon there shouldn’t be a reason why we can’t add extra tab instead of 5 per nation.
Yes, because in that case its better to add them as sub tress or individual vehicles to some trees
Yep, that is exacly what many people wanted when sub trees came
1 Like