No.
The crying was about that only the T-90M gets it. Now a whole bunch of them gets it as well.
Now, did they say, that only these will ever get spall liners? I don’t think so.
And because a Leopard has spall liners, it is russian bias? Or what do you want to say here?
Everybody complained BECAUSE it was tested on the T-90M. It wasn’t added BECAUSE people complained, but because they were impatient fucks who screamed “Russian Bias!!1!” when a tank was testing a new feature for less than a week
everyone else’s spall liners are rushed
And they had done no research on what tanks had spall liners until people started to report it
If they were planning to add at it to all i think they would said that in the stream and actually research what tanks had it instead of the community to fight for it
People have given a ton of declassified information. It isn’t hard Gaijin just refuses to accept it and loot it all over cause some are likely from 2nd, 3rd, or 4th sources sometimes unreliable. However it still wouldn’t be hard to pick and pull from these said sources on what is being stated in all of them and if there all saying a said thing then it is likely a factual claim rather than a bias claim.
A bit off-topic but it isn’t magic it comes down to modernization, US forces had better equipment, supply chains, and air dominance. While Iraq had a military larger than the US it was often not efficient with modern doctrines or tactics due to the age of everything. Iraq did not have proper communications, logistics, tanks, or properly trained personnel. The list goes on. In this simple case, Size didn’t matter if everything wasn’t up to date, and pissing off a World Power(The US) in the past leading to the USS Stark incident was only one aspect of the culmination of the invasion.
So were the T-90s? They remained unchanged until the end of the dev server, and were entirely remodeled along with the implementation of other vehicles’ spall liners.
Yes it is, 1 source says one thing but gets the same topics right, and 1 source will say another thing but those core topics from the previous one will remain relatively consistent.