They don’t, same with NATO MBTs.
You’d better not be parroting that stupid “b-but no cumulative spall!!1!” bullshit, as it’s just that… Bullshit. Every tank in the game has certain armor values set as that.
28%
half a dozen “game changing” counteroffensives, with 4x the leopards to boot
28% and an eastern seaboard
Because thunderskill is trustworthy, right?
And tank forces that have more flight hours than the air force
1 Like
Cosmonaut expedited training vehicles.
Pretty sure that’s the same 28% of [Country we’re not meant to mention] that has been at Civil War for 8 years before the 2022 ‘not a war’ (with certain little green men among the completely organic separatists) So congrats to them, I guess?
Pretty sure if the US took only 28% of Iraq and couldn’t go any further, the world would consider that a loss given the resources available to the US. Evidently we’re not meant to apply that same standard to the “2nd best military in the world.”
4 Likes
Well over 60% of [territory] has been revolting against [country] ever since '95. In moat areas like [southwestern port province] there was violent suppression of riots and such, as well as [two northern provinces with WW1 ship namesakes].
Even then, [eastern provinces] still had [opposing country’s military] stationed in it, as well as the entire eastern seaboard and southern territories up to [large and prominent river].
Iraq wasn’t the second largest military to America, unlike [country name]. Said [country’s military] is currently the second largest in [continent of country], just second behind [invader]. This is also taking into account that [country] has twice that of America’s troops in Iraq.
more trustworthy than snail sources for russian armor
bruh, russian tanks have much smaller spall without any reliable source (not with secondary shatter)
Agreed, all T-80Us have outdated armor arrays, as well as the T-72B 1989, T-72B3, T-90A, and the T-90M’s armor is just pure guesstimation.
hehe Yeah
We could tell by the 90+% Independence vote by [country] that 28% of [territory] wanted to be with [invader] … just didn’t actually want to start doing anything about it until [country] wanted to join [continental organization] which would deprive [invader] of their leased shipyard and only viable large naval base in the Black Sea. (Let’s not pretend [country] didn’t want to join [defensive alliance] all the way up until the [pro-defensive alliance] leader was poisoned and a had a change of heart after visiting [capital city] with [invader leader])
Iraq had a larger army in 2003 than [country] had in 2021…and was 5000-7000 away from the US over an ocean…not on their southern border next to their manufacturing heartland.
And was still smaller than Iraq’s. (Iraq didn’t get a chance to conscript a massive reserve… the US actually succeeded in the invasion.)
Iraq had twice the size in military compared to what the US sent as well.
The magic is in actually being a superpower, not cosplaying as one with memes to 14 year olds.
EDIT: At this point we can take this argument private as I’m not sure how far the technicality of not mentioning either belligerent by name will get it… in the ground vehicles discussion.
Yes, because Russian tanks have 3-4 internal plates that would create unimaginable amounts of spall if not configured properly. The shot simulation needs a rework.
how much are they paying you dmitri
what?
No vehicle has any spall liner modeled. This is a new addition with the T-90M.
2 Likes
Cute meme.
Just misses the point:
NATO Vehicles (Leopard and Abrams come to mind first) have had Spall protection built in since at least the 90s (Leo2A5, M1A1 HC/A2, etc) and they don’t get it.
Then a Russian tank FINALLY gets one in 2018 and it’s added to the game. It’s not even added alongside the others, it’s added first… so everyone (who has HAD spall protection the entire time) have to fight a tank which just got it, while waiting for it themselves.
On the bright side, the US finally got fired up enough to fight the uphill battle of Gaijin’s documentation to have their SEP tanks upgraded from 1984 hull armor…
3 Likes
Because Gaijin prioritizes Russian vehicles first and some individuals will not state who. Deny a lot of data from declassified etc for some reason however if someone posts a single document or Russian Vehcles that’s approved.
In the end some people in the suggestion forums need to be replaced however I won’t go further into this.
2 Likes