So why is T-90M the only tank with its spall liner modeled?

I think its very much a WIP, the new china tanks turret slat has ~5000mm of KE protection and 4000mm of roof KE protection.

1 Like

Gaijin moment

1 Like

bvvd脸都不要了,苏系胜率都多高了还他妈加强,本来苏系就是全方位碾压,还他妈加强,眼睛里掺屎了?

8 Likes

“Kiev in 3 guys”

“Crimea in a week”

5 Likes

Responding to issues regarding dev server reports & an update on spall lining armor from the developers - Official News, Development Blogs and Updates - War Thunder — official forum

They know the armor is overperforming, It is NOT Russia exclusive. Other vehicles will get spall liners as well.

So russian vehicles can continue to be played in a relaxed state and have little brain function needed to work. I have myself played most of the russian tech tree and i continue to survive side shots and my screw ups are more easily forgotten than other nations. For some reason it feels worse in top tier :P

if you would read any of dev statements you would knot that t-90m wont be the only tank with spall liners but keep on living in your russian bias world

1 Like

As I guess, gaijin’s idea is to make T-90M strong, as T-90M will be almost the same performance as T-72B3. But one is 11.3 and one is 11.7, T90M sure need something to make it stronger, but this is surely far too much.

They don’t, same with NATO MBTs.

You’d better not be parroting that stupid “b-but no cumulative spall!!1!” bullshit, as it’s just that… Bullshit. Every tank in the game has certain armor values set as that.

28%

half a dozen “game changing” counteroffensives, with 4x the leopards to boot

28% and an eastern seaboard

Because thunderskill is trustworthy, right?

And tank forces that have more flight hours than the air force

1 Like

Cosmonaut expedited training vehicles.

Pretty sure that’s the same 28% of [Country we’re not meant to mention] that has been at Civil War for 8 years before the 2022 ‘not a war’ (with certain little green men among the completely organic separatists) So congrats to them, I guess?

Pretty sure if the US took only 28% of Iraq and couldn’t go any further, the world would consider that a loss given the resources available to the US. Evidently we’re not meant to apply that same standard to the “2nd best military in the world.”

4 Likes

Well over 60% of [territory] has been revolting against [country] ever since '95. In moat areas like [southwestern port province] there was violent suppression of riots and such, as well as [two northern provinces with WW1 ship namesakes].

Even then, [eastern provinces] still had [opposing country’s military] stationed in it, as well as the entire eastern seaboard and southern territories up to [large and prominent river].

Iraq wasn’t the second largest military to America, unlike [country name]. Said [country’s military] is currently the second largest in [continent of country], just second behind [invader]. This is also taking into account that [country] has twice that of America’s troops in Iraq.

more trustworthy than snail sources for russian armor