Skillbased Matchmaking

[FlyingDoctor]

You’re the one refusing and you’re the one deriding as a common theme…

Nothing to do with me being ‘scared’… I’m just knowing that people like you would turn that ‘measure’ into an invalid gauge of ‘authority’ and ignore anyone who doesn’t match your deemed worthiness.

That’s how simple it is.

You prove it time and time again with making out that others don’t need to be considered because their numbers don’t match what you deem fit.

There is no conversing with you, because of this trait, and you show it on the regular as to be the case.

[ULQ_LOVER]

@FlyingDoctor

-snip-

So again nothing to prove what You have said.

If You want to write paragraphs without anything backing them up, do that in PMs and don’t bloat another thread with a tantrum.

Sorry but I won’t be going again around in circles because of You. I know that why You don’t like ideas I have proposed and it is visible to everyone why.

[FlyingDoctor]

No thanks, I don’t need your PMs, and fact is you couldn’t front up where I called you names trying to deflect from the point…

So I’ll reitterate…

@FlyingDoctor

You’re the one refusing and you’re the one deriding as a common theme…

Nothing to do with me being ‘scared’… I’m just knowing that people like you would turn that ‘measure’ into an invalid gauge of ‘authority’ and ignore anyone who doesn’t match your deemed worthiness.

That’s how simple it is.

You prove it time and time again with making out that others don’t need to be considered because their numbers don’t match what you deem fit.

There is no conversing with you, because of this trait, and you show it on the regular as to be the case.

The ninja edits you make are hilarious digs…

@ULQ_LOVER

don’t bloat another thread with a tantrum.

Sorry but I won’t be going again around in circles because of You. I know that why You don’t like ideas I have proposed and it is visible to everyone why.

You are avoiding the point, and you throwing this in shows you are indeed arguing in bad faith from the start.

[ULQ_LOVER]

@FlyingDoctor

The ninja edits you make are hilarious digs

I don’t make ninja edits, I just don’t want to destroy another topic because someone is throwing a tantrum again. As said in comment above.

[FlyingDoctor]

Who said anything about a tantrum? Oh that’s right, you…

You’re still avoiding the points made and you’re trying to backpedal your way out.

Where’d I call you names? You deflected for a bit there.

And that fact you’re now bringing in ‘tantrums’ as you commonly do when conversing with me to try and troll me out, is quite a subtle method.

SBMM won’t be the perfect solution you think it will because it won’t actually measure ‘everything’ that deserves to be measured, no matter how much you change the focus of whatever you deem to be measurable.

@FlyingDoctor

You’re the one refusing and you’re the one deriding as a common theme…

Nothing to do with me being ‘scared’… I’m just knowing that people like you would turn that ‘measure’ into an invalid gauge of ‘authority’ and ignore anyone who doesn’t match your deemed worthiness.

That’s how simple it is.

You prove it time and time again with making out that others don’t need to be considered because their numbers don’t match what you deem fit.

There is no conversing with you, because of this trait, and you show it on the regular as to be the case.

The fact you removed that segment I quoted as a ninja edit highlights your bad faith even more…

[ULQ_LOVER]

@FlyingDoctor

SBMM won’t be the perfect solution you think it will because it won’t actually measure ‘everything’ that deserves to be measured, no matter how much you change the focus of whatever you deem to be measurable.

All things done in battle matter and what I have said:

@ULQ_LOVER

matchmaking based on performance in battle

would solve all the things. It just doesn’t take into consideration things that didn’t happen.

[FlyingDoctor]

Thing is, you deem it not to have happened because it’s even being stated, but this forum is for discussion, not e-stroking and making videos…

If you can’t actually engage in discussion without having something you will no doubt dismiss as not suitable to your thoughts, then what’s the use anyway?

[CoffeeBean100]

Well said across the board. A bit of a more positive goes a long way rather than seeking answers to failings that are very subjective.

[CoffeeBean100]

There is a time to just avoid when you consider nothing actually changes in game.

[ULQ_LOVER]

@FlyingDoctor

discussion, not e-stroking and making videos…

Discussion requires something backing up Your statments.

@FlyingDoctor

If you can’t actually engage in discussion without having something you will no doubt dismiss as not suitable to your thoughts, then what’s the use anyway?

So now we are just making assumptions?

[FlyingDoctor]

Thing is, he’s making a stance on the forums on the regular, on the same old stats are everything mantra, and it’s time he was taken down a peg or 6…

[FlyingDoctor]

@ULQ_LOVER

Discussion requires something backing up Your statments.

You’re incorrect to be honest.

[ULQ_LOVER]

If we are going to have a discussion without any evidence/things to back up claims, then we should all belive people like flat-earthers.

[FlyingDoctor]

Reducto absurdium is peak bad faith in this situation.

So again, where do you think I called you names?

[ULQ_LOVER]

@FlyingDoctor

Reducto absurdium is peak bad faith in this situation.

The only bad faith in a discussion is refusal to provide anything to back up the statment and require people to belive just Your words and take them as fact.

[FlyingDoctor]

No, the actual bad faith is ignoring the point made to actually just keep attacking because you think they’re fair game because your stats seem better and you’ve been allowed to do it in the past…

It’s DISCUSSION… We don’t NEED to provide you with proof as it’s a DISCUSSION, not a TRIAL…

[ULQ_LOVER]

@FlyingDoctor

It’s DISCUSSION… We don’t NEED to provide you with proof as it’s a DISCUSSION, not a TRIAL…

We actually need proof/things to back up claims because otherwise there is no point in having a discussion. If I wanted to read conspiracy theories I would hop on Youtube or facebook.

[FlyingDoctor]

The fact you can’t highlight where I called you names, should dismiss your proof falacy…

@ULQ_LOVER

Matchmaking based on performance in battle would be a great thing.

The ranking position should also be visible to everyone.

@FlyingDoctor

So you can check it and shame them into submission in the way you constantly do?

No thanks. We don’t need more elitism, we need more inclusion and team based efforts rather than assumptions that all is lost because someone doesn’t match your opinion of thier numbers.

@ULQ_LOVER

So people can see with who they are talking about ;).

I know that it hurts too much when people start asking qustions about statments that people make. I love that You don’t even understand what I have written.

The fact you try to make an insult from this as per your usual methods should be enough to highlight that you are indeed the bad faith arguer in this situation.

[ULQ_LOVER]

So we are going again in circles?

I have already told You:

@ULQ_LOVER

If You want to write paragraphs without anything backing them up, do that in PMs and don’t bloat another thread with a tantrum.

Sorry but I won’t be going again around in circles because of You. I know that why You don’t like ideas I have proposed and it is visible to everyone why.

Don’t destroy another topic because You can’t cope with Your emotions. I won’t be answearing another comment that is not on topic.

[FlyingDoctor]

There’s no circles, you’re refusing to even acknowledge the point because you deem it not to fit…

You’re the one trying to make it about emotions and tantrums.

It’s about discussion, it’s not a trial… Your refusal shows you are just that fixated on dismissing and deriding rather than actually engaging, like you proclaim to be.