As are many who bait me, what’s the difference?
No, I didn’t misinterpret the term, I made the statement about what that term meant.
If you can’t see that if the metrics don’t match, and aren’t measurable as what they are and what contribution you make, you’re definitly excluding, and marginalising non-responsible or unintended targets.
That’s what the problem is with SBMM.
(Edit - Nope)
The best option would be matchmaking based on performance in battle.
It would take into account all playstyles and things done in battle.
Funny is that most people that are against are the ones that are scared of people finding out that they are just bad in game.
The popularity of games with some kind of SBMM is enough evidence to show that people like it.
That’s absolute assumption based on no actual evidence whatsoever…
Really?
Let us see Your own comments talking about this:
Some from the beginning of our previous talk already show that You don’t want players to know who is bad and who is good based on game performance.
Not to mention that the comment wasn’t targeted at You in first place.
The fact you have to rely on this ‘I’m better than you’ stance is so pitiful as it shows the true bad faith argument for all it’s absolute idiocy…
Any counter to anyone having a moan about CAS, is met with ‘They so this because they are so bad at the game that they need to do this’…
Same with the airfield camping, any counter is met with a ‘You must do it to be so against this’.
Same with spawncamping, ‘You must do it, to not want it stopped’ and all the rest of every other bad faith arguments you can do to make out that I’m just a bad player who doesn’t want to be seen to be bad.
And I call high as nonsense on your claim this wasn’t a dig at me, as you bring stats into every conversation we have, with proof and all that other ‘dig’ nonsense to try make your opposition go away.
After all, where’d the tantrum throwout go now huh? Moved on to other things because you didn’t get the spam and rage you were expecting… Typical.
So ye, this:
is just real. Thanks for proving that.
What does this even insinuate? Are you sure you’re even making a statement or just talking trash to keep going?
You have just proven that what I have said is right, nothing else.
Thanks for collaboration of showing this.
Then you admit you’re lying and being hypocritical… Cool beans.
I’m not lying about anything.
You have proved that statment:
To be true. Anyone can see it by reading Your own comments.
Then you did lie if you said that it wasn’t about me.
It wasn’t about You in first place.
As I have mentioned people, not one person and You serve as the example of someone who is against it and You meet the requirements that I have described. You put Yourself in that place by trying to say that this statment is false.
I can make a statment that there is many people bad at the game in forums and just because You meet the requirements doesn’t mean that the statment is about You in first place.
Wonderful, anything else you’d like to throw in?
Nice edit… It just shows more as to how you are that kind of person. You gotta backpedal now because you know you stepped.
Of course, performance based matchmaking and visible ranking would make this game much better, not to mention forums.
So now I can’t edit one of my comments as I wanted to clarify things more? Good to know.
Absolute tripe… You’d just get your echo chamber you wish for… This is after all why you want the skill based system,. because you think it’d pair you with more worthy players to hang around with.
You ain’t clarifying, you’re making excuses and trying to wriggle.
The fact you had to throw in the forums in this now, is indicative of the simplistic nature of your jabs.
It would make things better for everyone as many problems would cease to exist as they are mostly tied to teams being unbalanced. But ok, belive in what You want.
No excuses, just how things are. Moderators/admins can see what was the comment before editing so it wouldn’t change a thing.
I distinctly quoted the forums bit as that absurdity proves your issue is just you wanting to quell anything else…
Bad faith to try and conflate that point with the rest of the statement… Otherwise, you are the one that doesn’t understand…
And I urge a moderator to absolutely review it… The fact of you trying to ‘’‘clarify’‘’ this is you trying to avoid the actual issue, much the same as your conflation just then.
It was distinctly about your addition of the forums to it. The fact you even thought that, is indicative of your dislike of actual engagement, rather than ego-stroking and echo-chambering.
If You don’t understand how quality of the gameplay would make forums better, let me clarify that for You.
If games become better with performance based matchmaking, people won’t be having issues related to things that happen because of unbalaned teams, thus we can focus on more important things like new modes/mechanics.
EDIT (because You are going to have a problem with it): Not to mention that some problems are tied to people not being good in game which could be seen with the ranking.
I thought that You can understand the relation of gameplay quality to the forum one.
Weren’t You the one making conspiracy theories that I have some kind of good relations with moderators?
You make that statement like I have said it multiple times, which is bad faith again…
You’re lying about your intent on throwing in the forums, and it’s laughable you still try backpedal and excuse it.
If that was the case, you’d have said that the forums would be more calm if the devs let you have that old Tank Only mode, or anything that gets spammed about on the regular that you fuel constantly.
Sorry but I’m not the one lying, what I say is just true.
Performance based matchmaking would solve some of the issues of unbalance and current GF RBs mode could change in a way that no TO mode is needed.
I have already talked about it when talking about changes that could solve the issue of unbalance between ground and air