Simple changes that would improve the maps part 1

Personally my total RP per match is adding up to be more than before. Sure it feels like less but in reality its coming at a more rapid pace

I find I am just losing respect for the game but in doing so I have become like the pro Gaijin posse on here.I just play for myself and treat the game with the contempt it deserves and pretend all the bad points dont exist.

Flanders is awesome i hide in the storage bunker are in wait in my Strv 40L to engine kill a poor tiger before torturing him

1 Like

Hmm, is that coping mechanism i hear?? We cant have that justice for gotham!!!

Those kind of players are the worst! Bc they argue complete off topic. A Skill issue is when you try to use your -10° and you weaf or you weaf a shot but the enemys isnt even watching ur direction.

Maybe it is, but its real strengh isnt CQB same as the other western style vehicles. Eastern style vehicles are for low terrain they build for that bc of russia has that many mountains and hills in their territory, thats what people dont get. They watch this game like an alternative to Battlefield or Call of Duty with Vehicles. (And it kinda is currently)

Nah. I mean one point cap modes arent that funny in the most cases bc of allies only focuse on that single cap even if the enemy is flanking their sides and the sad part is, they know that the enemy is flanking but still only focusing that single cap.
But Single cap also can be fun. Imho this Call of Dutys Domination playstyle with caps is pretty outdated and they have to do some effort and work in the current modes. It not only affect GRB, in GSB its the same.
So that only removal dont really would change alot.

Are you refering to my “maps are to small and their layouts are to lame for certain BRs” ?

okey. I guess I know what you wanna say, but didnt you think the game needs improvement?
I mean only why we make suggestions and discuss about them, doesnt mean we dont like the game or we just complain about it. Maybe I got you wrong here…

“Enemy with the better players wins” not the most. I already turned games with friends and even when I played alone, those are the moments what I feel the most.

Why thinking only so simple? Spin it further your idea. Adding more content in the actual modes, sounds great and I think many of the players would agree. Only caps? Do you want to play Domination only? Think about it what you wanna see.
For example there is the Heli PvE mode, one of the saddest and baddest modes ever created imo. But its an EC mode, where you have multiple objectives in the battle. There you have Enemy plane formations which wanna bomb ground targets, you have Ground battles where two AI Teams fight stationary and you objective is to destroy the enemys of course, then you have the bases which you have to destroy, enemy AI Convoys. So there is tons of Content ideas out there and I bet if people stop complaining about simple things and start thinking how to improve the game with fresh things, it would be a whole other discussion.

Aslong as we stick to “old” gamemodes, as long we get “old” problems with it.

:)

They make maps from update to update bigger not smaller, but they arent big enough for certain BRs imho.
And they dont have to “fix” it. It should be a mode where you can play even if GRB and GSB small maps, when people like it, why delete it?
But they should do a Mode to with biga$$ maps where a match is significantly longer than 10 minutes.
Okey then we have 15 different modes out there, but who cares? Other games do it too, why shouldnt gaijin do it with WT either?

Fact! Not everybody like everything. And you shouldnt be force to. If you like CQB Maps then you should have the possibility to play those maps, same counts for maps which are built like “lanes”, open maps, small maps, biga$$ maps, maps with different terrain in it(like a map that has rivers connected with bridges, lakes big and small ones, cities and villages, forrests, open fields, mountainchains and hills, etc. But for those options WT needs to be improve Gamemode wise and maplayout wise, not only focusing on “new vehicles types” bc not only premium are their income also premium time etc and if the player has more variety then I assume that they would spend alot more)

You get now quicker less RP, but players like me, tend to see a big amount of RP/SL in a longer period of time.

3 Likes

Bigger maps, dynamic spawns…revolutionary and radical, yet so damn simple :-)
Both would solve a bunch of issues this game currently has in regards to both spawncamping from ground and air.

Until that, for the love of all that is holy they should ditch conquest in RB asap!

It’s just sad that maps are getting smaller and smaller, battles faster and faster, maps more and more broken ( like Ardennes domination #2) after Gaijin “fixing”.

Neither. It was meant more generally in relation to social development. A brief example, albeit far removed from the game: I was fed up with the country I grew up in and solved my problem without further ado by emigrating. Best decision in my life.
I think that some maps are actually too small for certain BR areas and the design and layouts are also in need of improvement.

Oh and how I see room for improvement, even in the spawn areas, CAS, vehicle balance.
But I also see the opportunity for improvement with many players. But I can’t and won’t demand that of anyone. I wish for it. More is not possible and should not be. Because it’s a game and I don’t want anyone to be pulling all-nighters to become a better player.
It should be a natural desire to get better by learning from situations and trying to avoid mistakes. And that’s where I see problems. Many people give up their brains when they click on "to Battle!

On the contrary, I think suggestions are so important and I also think it’s important to talk about them. It is sometimes … well … to put it mildly … repetitive to hear the same demands that have been used for a long time and don’t bring about any improvements.
I’ve been here for over 300 days and it always goes round in circles. There are clever people here with good suggestions. And there are good proposals that just can’t be implemented. We need to talk about that.
And a proposal must also be able to withstand someone saying “The problem lies elsewhere and your proposal won’t bring any improvement”. But many people react allergically in these moments.

I would like to see more courage from Gaijin to try new things. Because it’s not just the players who are greedy (in terms of event vehicles and the like), but also the snail has realised exactly what it needs to do to generate FOMO.

Wise words! Amen!

2 Likes

Is that gibberish i hear? What?

Let me guess you either grew up in Germany, Austria or the US.

1 Like

Till Lindemann GIF

If you can guess where I am now, you’ll get … no idea ^^

1 Like

Hungary ? haha or was the Gif with Rammstein a hint that youre really in Rammstein rn?

To finish the OT ^^ I went from Germany to Sweden. But I got indeed a small connection to Rammstein ^^ I was the postman who delivered the mail to Richard Kruspe and Flake ^^ they both live in the same neighbourhood.

1 Like

Wow thats cool! Sweden interesting. I love my little corrupt austria to much to leave it and if I would consider to leave then it would be madeira, malta or something where its warm weather conditions.

1 Like

Welcome to sweden sorry for the current crimewave 😅

Anyway, have you been to any of our national armour and aviation museums. The aviation archive has flight logs, and manuals for every aircraft sweden has ever operated. Its a damn good source for info

2 Likes

No, no more mal changes. You guys suggest these things and they ruin the maps entirely.

If you wanna stick to the old small CQB Maps, then do so. But I dont wanna and alot of players also.

The old maps were bigger. What are you talking about? The EE maps were huge. We are now moving into small CQB maps…

Those were the really old ones. I talked about the current maps and called it old. In my example the EC Maps what I was refering to would be the “new” ones.

I can’t even decipher that buddy. I tried but you’ve lost me.

The old maps were larger. They butchered the crap out of all the maps in the last year or two. We used to have large open maps.

Now we have small squished maps. They’ve taken out huge areas and made sections out of bounds. The map design has severely deteriorated. It’s honestly very annoying.

Ive lost you? Maybe bc I wrote it to confusy ? I just said that I know the map were larger, Tunesia large for example. But that isnt what I meant. I described a scenario which would be the current maps would be “the old ones” IF there would be EC Ground maps where ONE Square (A5 for example) would be for 10.0 1000meters or maybe 2000meters large. Then those maps would be “the new ones”.

I know that there was Maps back then which were much larger than today ones.