Or something that fires back from the ground other than destroyer of world Sidams.
And ranges that actually warrant the new kit for striking said targets.
Yeah, unfortunately, though those are also 3 major locations on the island from the war. So there is still a little hope
Yeah, fingers crossed they’ll port over some bits from the SEAD event
RB and Sim are both supposed to have, on paper, 1:1 correspondence to publicly available aircraft documentation’s predicted/described characteristics limited by system requirements and abstractions.
In RB, additionally, for Mouse aim through “Realistic” joystick controls there are some changes to make flying easier. I’ve read a content creator say that “Realistic” joystick control dampens propeller effects far more significantly than just autotrim would imply allowing for greater near-stall control for bf109s compared to sim controls.
Keeping SB and RB parallel beyond control simplifications should be prudent however.
One thing I do feel SB would benefit from would be standardizing phyisiological effects on crew.
It’s a bit absurd that I can camp ~6.0G without a G suit on a maxed crew without any hint of vignetting/risk of G-LOC. Sim should have more realistic stamina and G-LOC mechanics similar to IL-2:GB.
Another thing I do recall is apparently some modern aircraft flight dynamics are optimized for mouse aim inputs according to the same content creator based on Issues/bug reports discussions.
1 Like