Should the BR Spread be reduced to 0.7 Maximum

But this system wouldn’t apply to just higher BRs.

Many 5.7 vehicles would struggle against 6.7 heavies. Same with 6.0 vehicles vs 7.0. You’d have to be lucky to have something in your garage at 5.7 that will pen the jagdtiger or the Tiger 2. Sure there are ‘weak’ spots but assuming both players are competent it would be very difficult to kill the uptiered tank with heavy armor.

That’s the problem. Most BRs have no compression, and this idea compresses the matchmaker which harms match variety at best and at worst causes BR compression.

Most 5.7s don’t struggle against 6.7s, it’s a select few, and those select few struggle because BR 2.7 is compressed which causes some 5.7s to be a higher BR than they should be.

haha

3 Likes

I don’t have the faintest clue as to how it is for GRB, but I assure that BR compression is very much alive for Air RB at every single BR except maybe for 1 or 2 but I don’t know really.

(it is)

Air RB’s compression is all at jets, and it’s 2 BRs: 9.3 which impacts BRs down to 7.0, and 13.0 which impacts BRs down to 11.3.
I know these ones because I’ve completed and analyzed all ten air trees.

Not true.

it’s not exactly compression. Low-tier problem is and has always been overtiered vehicle. even more than jet tiers just because how some plane are thoroughly abused for it’s good FM.

Air is massively compressed from 1.0 to 14.3.

Which is one reason why they will never do this. (The other being that it’s a company and they have a vested interest that doesn’t always align with the player’s).

A change that impacts all BRs at once brings with it an enormous amount of variables, very hard to fully map out in advance. Metas would shift, SP costs and loadouts would need a rethink, you’d need time to collect and analyse all the new data you’re getting, premium vehicles would be affected, the perception/narrative about it would be difficult to control… Etc etc

A well established company with a long lasting successful product is unlikely to take such a big risk.

i’d still say that it’s mostly unfair overtiering. 5.3 Zero with no 13mm just because people did good in it is just an example.

2 Likes

The only thing that you would be doing is making your full uptiers less painful and your downtiers less overpowered. SU33 would stop seeing F4J and the latter would stop seeing MiG 21BIS, which would stop seeing Mirage 3C which would no longer be facing Sabres. The changes in meta will happen but I cannot imagine any shift that could be negative. If anything it would probably give new life to jets that were in awkward positions, while ensuring that these same jets don’t become OP in a downtier.

If Gaijin were to do something like this I imagine they would perform some sort of analysis, but I’m not expecting this change to come with any BR changes to existing aircraft; it’s not necessary in any circumstance to rebalance any plane individually in order to perform this change. I do think this would have an impact on lineups for GRB but I was only talking about air, should’ve mentioned that earlier.

Of course, the game not being balanced is by design to promote sales, so it’s also hard to think Gaijin would do anything to change that drastically in the first place.

1 Like

There are many undertiered props

Looks at every yak

makes the game far more playable

Seeing this as a pure academic discussion i have a deviating pov.

  1. Imho the BRs are just loosely connected to actual combat effectiveness - they are determined by “allowed” SL/RP gains (=a specific threshold) of vehicles for the plain average user. If a vehicle overperforms it gets a BR increase - if it underperforms a lower BR.

  2. That can be seen indirectly in the more or less pointless BR reconciliation rounds with thousands of player posts and just a handful of adjustments of the announced BR changes to their final versions.

  3. Imho you overestimate the effects of a 0.7 spread - it boils down that vehicles would just become less dominant in a full downtier or less inferior in a full uptier.

  4. The impact on BRs for individual vehicles is dependent on their players and their average results. And from my pov BRs are only decisive if a veteran player can’t close the performance gap vs a rookie using a vehicle 1.0 higher. If BRs would play a major role for gaijin regarding the game play we would have 6 BR adjustment rounds per year - and not 2 or 3 like in the last years.

  5. Imho it is way more decisive who is controlling/playing the highest BR vehicles playing a full downtier. You need no tinfoil hat to assume that gaijin is able to steer this. So the MM and the nation allocation is way more decisive than most players are aware of.

  6. So from a pure game play perspective (= for players) a 0.7 spread would flatten performance gaps with the lowest effort for gaijin.

Have a good one!

3 Likes

Probably even more. Sometimes i wonder why even bother going on the Forum or why they even have it when they just do whatever. Whether its about Grind, Map Design, BR Changes etc. not only isn’t Gaijin doing anything the Community has been discussing/suggesting/critizing etc since like years they are often doing the exact opposite lmao.

I’ve yet to see evidence of a prop BR being compressed.
Every time someone mentioned a singular plane I ended up seeing its equals being the same BR.

The reason why the Zero went to 5.3 is because it stopped facing only under-BR"d American props and could face the correctly BR’d props of Germany, Britain, USSR, etc.
And when a prop balanced around under-BR’d props starts facing correctly BR’d props… it goes up.

And what exactly constitutes as evidence in your very important judgement?

Spiderman Funny GIF - Spiderman Funny Laugh - Discover & Share GIFs

You made my day! Thx man! 👍

2 Likes