Gaijin has never decompressed. extending the maximum BR and moving a few vehicles up is nothing compared to the number of vehicles added and the power creep.
Gaijin’s BR system is moronic and illogical. it’s not decimalised or even spaced evenly. their byzantine system and their refusal to change it at all massively limits what they can do. it’s one of gaijin’s many failings.
0.7 is the same as 1.0. If you can’t handle vehicles at same BR, two BRs just 0.3 and 0.7 different, and the maximum of 4 per side of top BR, then you won’t do any better in a 0.7 MM. People will just find another thing to put all their failures on.
The top 4 players per side are not the top 4 BR players, in fact depending on player actions in a match the top few can easily be someone in a +1.
Defeatism is strong in this game.
Of course ARB the spread can be more noticeable due to one vehicle, GRB is more cope since we all have access to varied lineups.
0.7 is terrible and outdated, and is one of the reasons War Thunder isn’t as compressed today as it was back then.
Decompression > compression.
@Hannarr
They have decompressed at least 5 times, otherwise F-14B would be 10.7 right now, and M1A2 would be 10.3.
Not needed.
Actually the game is far more compressed now that it was “back then”. which is as i said because of all the additional vehicles and massive powercreep. extending the ground tree 0.3-0.4 and moving a few vehicles provides no decompression to 95% of the trees. even you with your incredible bias should be able to understand that.
If the game was far more compressed than back then, then Maus would be 6.7, M1A2 would be 10.0, the top jet BR would be 10.3, and so forth.
However, the top jet BR is 13.0, the top ground BR is 11.7, Maus is 7.7, etc.
The game is far more decompressed today than it was back then.
The fact you claim being biased for decompression is a bad thing is hilarious.
T-72B3 use to be 10.3.
Okay, so you’re conflating balancing with decompression, which it’s not. do you not understand how the analogy and pressure work?
The top jet isn’t 13.0 yet.
I didn’t claim you were “being biased for decompression”, and it’s hilarious that your reading comprehension is so poor you thought that. my impression that you’re biased come from your countless illogical posts that generally defend gaijin’s decisions.
It is a band-aid solution that will help a bit, but it won’t solve the core issue of Br compression. I don’t think it would be terrible, but it wouldn’t solve the main issue.
Decompressing the BRs by adding 2.0 onto the current top BRs is a better solution.
It’s not even a band-aid solution cause it’d cause more imbalance than 2014 War Thunder.
Decompression is faster, easier, and superior.
Of course, easier is relative to the alternative described in this topic.
1.0 minimum is indeed superior, in both impact and speed of development.
@Hannarr
Well, stop confusing decompression and balancing then.
You did, right here. Everyone can see you’re complaining that I want decompression.
And now you claim asking for more decompression is defending Gaijin… lol
That or you’re claiming criticizing War Thunder is defending Gaijin.
Then definitely not needed.
Also, 7.7 and higher isn’t the “end of the tree”.
Most vehicles are currently balanced.
Some aren’t, and no 0.7 does not decompress, it never has and never will.
It requires more work than decompression, it compresses the matchmaker, and it requires Gaijin to rebalance vehicles even more than just decompression.
Nope. you’re strawmanning which doesn’t surprise me at all. i said you’re biased in general and didn’t mention decompression in that bias… lol.
The “decompression” you want isn’t decompression at all, which was my point in my last comment. if you let some pressure out and then increase the pressure more than you reduced it that’s not decompression.
The only bias I in this topic is me being for decompression.
So there’s no other bias you could be talking about when that’s the only one.
And now you claim decompression isn’t decompression… which is like claiming water isn’t water.
In-fact, you literally agree with me in your last sentence.
Again with the poor reading comprehension. i didn’t mention your bias in this topic but in general.
I’m not sure there’s enough crayons to explain to you how 1-1+2 is more than 1. if you can’t understand that that’s a problem i don’t think anyone can fix.
Nope. you just seem to have problems with reading, understanding or both. again 1-1+2 is more than 1, which means there’s more compression not less.
Oh, so now you do not think the following:
This statement agrees with what I stated in this topic, and I agree with that statement still.
So is past you wrong or do you concede to agreeing with me?
Also, look up what psychological projection is, then re-read your false accusations against everyone on the forum.
You have a really hard time with this. I’m not even saying that you’re saying that you don’t want decompression. i’m saying that the decompression you’re advocating, which is the same that gaijin is “implementing”, results in net compression because there is more compression occurring than there is decompression.
I can’t make you understand this, but i’ve made it as clear and concise as is reasonably possible. And i know what psychological projection is, it seems that you don’t.
Quick question, are you aware of who Alvis is?
The decompression I’ve pushed for years now is the same one Defyn, Tim’s Variety, etc push for.
So by claiming that decompression isn’t decompression, and claiming we’re all wrong and you’re the only correct one… all the while making the same statements we do from time to time…
It’s all just insulting.
Everyone can’t be wrong with you as the only correct one.
@Italy_Suffers
And now you’re coming in here to call everyone in the WT community insults.
Everyone? Everyone? Or just you because you are a contrarian
@Italy_Suffers 's now claiming everyone arguing for decompression are contrarians.
LOL! You can’t make this up.
Consistent good takes & views that only change when superior evidence is provided is contrarian to you…
Nobody on this forum thinks you’re for decompression.
And now you’re implying that everyone on the forum is illiterate…
Why do you think no one can understand my basic English posts?
I make sure anyone can understand that decompression is superior to all other alternatives, as the alternatives are always far more convoluted, backwards, and/or generally complicated.