Should napalm be removed from any plane classified as a fighter?

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
101

cant wait for F-22 with thermobaric bombs lol

102

Whoa whoa whoa
Chill down a bit will ya

Calling names can’t create constructive discussion but creates angry arguing instead.

We have players who want to

  • A2A in fighter
  • A2A in attacker/bomber
  • A2G in fighter
  • A2G in attacker/bomber

We need everyone’s opinion to fix this problem in proper way.

103

Generally, multirole/fighter bombers don’t serve as strike craft in highly contested airspace.

“Did P-47s ditch their bombs if they got ambushed?”
“Irrelevant, P-47s didnt’ carry bombs if there was high risk of ambush.”

104

@Stockholm_Blend You should delete your post and reply to the correct post.
The post you responded to has no name calling.
It’s a joke between friends.

105

Then PM might fit more.
Also, it seems that you are trying to make fun of him. To me.

106

Well, I saw someone else recommended SB instead too.
Maybe the current ARB is not a place for Tornado IDS. :|
Either AAB or ASB seems fine.

107

i want to do all of them lol

108

Maybe if strategic bombers where a thing and the maps where way bigger

109

Ask your crews about it ;-)

1 Like
110

V-Force-734x1024
V-Force-734x1024734×1024 88.6 KB

V-Bombers in WT when?

1 Like
111

B-58-with-Multiple-Weapons-500x343
:)

1 Like
112

Don’t think so, if the Aircraft can carry this kind of weapon there is no reason to remove it.

Also, aircrafts like F-15 and F-16 are multipurpose.

113

I think if they just removed them from premium fighters then it would bring some sort of balance since the TT variants can have easier stock grind and there is no stock grind for premiums.

114

Regardless of that, bombing stuff on the map should change the environment on the map at the very least, while it could very well drain tickets as well.

1 Like
115

It did in fact and a lot of people complained about losing to four bombers

116

A lot of people = fighter jockeys getting mad the world isn’t revolving around them.

1 Like
117

Same reason they limited the teams to 4 bombers a team

118

Some of the ‘bad’ fighter mains (which can be described by shameful nicknames as ‘Fighter jocks’) even complained about IL-2, AD-4 or A-10 for draining tickets.

So it may not be a surprise to complain about Airfield defeat…

119

This was all the way back when I was trying to play bombers and actively would escort bombers

120

They should bring that limit back as well so each team has at maximum 4 planes that carry ground ordnance.