Not sure how they work, might look it up. Think that’s surely the only way they will work right? otherwise how do they detonate.
2 Likes
we dont have them in game. will check later
Will be fun u just start throwing chaff in a head on. ARH missiles are gonna be so messed up.
We play an arcade game where F-16’s can recover in a quarter turn from 90+ degree AoA cartwheels, this has never been about getting valid sources.
If the AMRAAM series performed as it does IRL, the MICA would not have much of an advantage in HOBS scenarios. It would be king of air to air missiles without competition.
3 Likes
considering AIM-120’s relatively smaller fin, If other factors like speed not considered, it should be less maneuverable. IRL condition isn’t like warthunder, much farther combat range and less mobility planes, smaller fins for longer range is better.
not saying it can’t be more maneuverable irl, with more updated flight control program, it can be more maneuverable
2 Likes
Yet they use this excuse not to change values on AMRAAM.
1 Like
Where are C701 and C704? Gaijin clearly already has the model
3 Likes
Never give up large-aperture CMs, because they are 5 to 10 times more powerful than CMs or small CMs. If you’re playing as a country other than China or the Soviet Union, you should intuitively understand this.
It’s natural that Large CM*48 is tough, but I feel like we’ll sink deeper into the mud if we get fooled by short-term numbers and lose the large caliber. And this is the advantage I like about the J-10C.
96 small countermeasure number where does that come from as J11B has 96 large ? if there swapping it they could just give it the one from the J11B
People just talking about Russian patent that allows to change large calibre launchers for the small calibre ones.
Problem is that this is for the modern cassetes that are only used on Su-30SM/2 and Su-35
J-15T and Su-33 use older 3-round launchers
1 Like
Really pisses me off it’s not added yet, those been in the files for like 2 years now and would act like AGM-65 with somewhat larger warhead if I’m not mistaken
Gatekeeping proper CAS for China while Russia has had Kh-38 for a good while is insane, about time China received AGM-65 equalivent AGM, same situation with USA being stuck with AGM-65 for years and them not getting proper IR glidebombs even though they easily could in the current meta of IR glide bombs
Makes me wonder if it’s pure laziness, lack of competence, short memory or they just love gatekeeping certain nations and weapons systems because they feel like it
3 Likes
I mean itself clearly the latter here, they’re export weapons it’s not that particularly hard to find the basic information necessary to implement them aside from deliberate handicapping.
1 Like
It says it has a range of 120 km, but if it doesnt have gnss how is it supposed to hit a target 120 km away? is the iog perfectely accurate or is the seeker able to lock 120 km away?
also are we stuck with 1.0 M release speeds for all china missiles due to lack of sources?
2 Likes
why does the j10c have a double pylon of LS-6, but the pylons looks like they are able to carry 3 of em.
And the j15 have the same pylon, but cant use it to carry 2 or 3 LS-6’s
2 Likes
The dev will end tomorrow, and the time left is obviously not enough for the j15 to complete the radar or the kd88a and pl12a, and each time the Chinese vehicle has to wait a long time to complete
5 Likes
Its still just a C&P of the KH-59 its not done
gaijin made the model of LS-6 too big so it seems there are interference, but actually no.
nerf or they just forget
3 Likes
S-8P/PM
1 Like
