Shenyang J-11, J-16, J-15, History, Performance & Discussion

Really pisses me off it’s not added yet, those been in the files for like 2 years now and would act like AGM-65 with somewhat larger warhead if I’m not mistaken

Gatekeeping proper CAS for China while Russia has had Kh-38 for a good while is insane, about time China received AGM-65 equalivent AGM, same situation with USA being stuck with AGM-65 for years and them not getting proper IR glidebombs even though they easily could in the current meta of IR glide bombs

Makes me wonder if it’s pure laziness, lack of competence, short memory or they just love gatekeeping certain nations and weapons systems because they feel like it

3 Likes

I mean itself clearly the latter here, they’re export weapons it’s not that particularly hard to find the basic information necessary to implement them aside from deliberate handicapping.

1 Like


It says it has a range of 120 km, but if it doesnt have gnss how is it supposed to hit a target 120 km away? is the iog perfectely accurate or is the seeker able to lock 120 km away?

also are we stuck with 1.0 M release speeds for all china missiles due to lack of sources?

1 Like


image
image

why does the j10c have a double pylon of LS-6, but the pylons looks like they are able to carry 3 of em.
And the j15 have the same pylon, but cant use it to carry 2 or 3 LS-6’s

1 Like

The dev will end tomorrow, and the time left is obviously not enough for the j15 to complete the radar or the kd88a and pl12a, and each time the Chinese vehicle has to wait a long time to complete

4 Likes

Its still just a C&P of the KH-59 its not done

gaijin made the model of LS-6 too big so it seems there are interference, but actually no.

nerf or they just forget

2 Likes

S-8P/PM

cohetes s-8

15thswpc2-shimlettbay-1400x930 - copia (2)

8 Likes

ha, I remember my first suggestion, AP rocket for S-8/S-13. failed several times for not fit the suggestion requirements, then I give up

1 Like

gaijin seems to think china and the us kept making worse missiles since aim120 and pl-12

4 Likes

Aim120 is not worse. We know exact propellant mass and we can see they put the improvement of the “+5” motor into bigger warhead which is irrelevant in warthunder but clearly something they valued.

I dont understand why people are shocked that some missile with IRL restrictions and environment is bad in 15G third person game.

PL-12A is question of sources, now that we got PL12A = PL12AE its gonna be just question of getting sources as that was the biggest hurdle

J-15T still lacking it’s tinted glass after today’s update and missing it on the loading screen

Spoiler



53ed1838gy1i8zzzh8pmmj22yo1qs4qr

image
image

12 Likes
1 Like

At least they said enhanced propulsion, looking forward to a newer, stronger motor

1 Like

gnss would be sweet

Statcard in game says it has it but it realistically does nothing.

and i guess we’re not getting the new HUD anytime soon.

+let { ilsJ10a, ilsJ10c, ilsJf17, ilsJ15t } = require("%rGui/planeIlses/ilsJ10a.nut")

just as forgotten as even giving proper real units to the placeholder of HMD on j10

The kd88 pylon is funky as hell tho

image

Two ignored reports on that issue
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/uF5n9J63L3fG
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/amA9c5I2FAn6

1 Like