Yet they use this excuse not to change values on AMRAAM.
1 Like
Where are C701 and C704? Gaijin clearly already has the model
3 Likes
Never give up large-aperture CMs, because they are 5 to 10 times more powerful than CMs or small CMs. If you’re playing as a country other than China or the Soviet Union, you should intuitively understand this.
It’s natural that Large CM*48 is tough, but I feel like we’ll sink deeper into the mud if we get fooled by short-term numbers and lose the large caliber. And this is the advantage I like about the J-10C.
96 small countermeasure number where does that come from as J11B has 96 large ? if there swapping it they could just give it the one from the J11B
People just talking about Russian patent that allows to change large calibre launchers for the small calibre ones.
Problem is that this is for the modern cassetes that are only used on Su-30SM/2 and Su-35
J-15T and Su-33 use older 3-round launchers
2 Likes
Really pisses me off it’s not added yet, those been in the files for like 2 years now and would act like AGM-65 with somewhat larger warhead if I’m not mistaken
Gatekeeping proper CAS for China while Russia has had Kh-38 for a good while is insane, about time China received AGM-65 equalivent AGM, same situation with USA being stuck with AGM-65 for years and them not getting proper IR glidebombs even though they easily could in the current meta of IR glide bombs
Makes me wonder if it’s pure laziness, lack of competence, short memory or they just love gatekeeping certain nations and weapons systems because they feel like it
3 Likes
I mean itself clearly the latter here, they’re export weapons it’s not that particularly hard to find the basic information necessary to implement them aside from deliberate handicapping.
1 Like
It says it has a range of 120 km, but if it doesnt have gnss how is it supposed to hit a target 120 km away? is the iog perfectely accurate or is the seeker able to lock 120 km away?
also are we stuck with 1.0 M release speeds for all china missiles due to lack of sources?
2 Likes
why does the j10c have a double pylon of LS-6, but the pylons looks like they are able to carry 3 of em.
And the j15 have the same pylon, but cant use it to carry 2 or 3 LS-6’s
2 Likes
The dev will end tomorrow, and the time left is obviously not enough for the j15 to complete the radar or the kd88a and pl12a, and each time the Chinese vehicle has to wait a long time to complete
5 Likes
Its still just a C&P of the KH-59 its not done
gaijin made the model of LS-6 too big so it seems there are interference, but actually no.
nerf or they just forget
3 Likes
S-8P/PM
1 Like
ha, I remember my first suggestion, AP rocket for S-8/S-13. failed several times for not fit the suggestion requirements, then I give up
2 Likes
gaijin seems to think china and the us kept making worse missiles since aim120 and pl-12
6 Likes
Aim120 is not worse. We know exact propellant mass and we can see they put the improvement of the “+5” motor into bigger warhead which is irrelevant in warthunder but clearly something they valued.
I dont understand why people are shocked that some missile with IRL restrictions and environment is bad in 15G third person game.
PL-12A is question of sources, now that we got PL12A = PL12AE its gonna be just question of getting sources as that was the biggest hurdle
J-15T still lacking it’s tinted glass after today’s update and missing it on the loading screen
14 Likes