Premiums have little to do with it, because its the same ratio.
Premiums have everything to do with it, not my fault you didn’t know this and actually just though it was because such and such nations bad…
The US at those BRs had a 60% WR, then the wolfpack was added, then the KVT was added, now both Russia and the US are trying to compete for who will suck more, because both sides are filled with nothing but premiums now, go figure.
Also, you should stop trying to look like you know what you are talking about i.e. go read up on what libel is…
I think to accurately get win rate results is to bring back/add to GRB the 1 vs 1 nation.
The only nations with accurate win rate are the big 3 USA/USSR/Germany since the majority of the times its always full of them. But the other nations not so much.
Because the HC/A2/SEPv1 are still very capable tanks and can be played aggresively well. It just takes significantly more awareness and skill to do so than in a 2A7V, Strv 122 and BVM.
Just because you can sit in a ditch the entire game and it’s the easiest to do, doesn’t mean it’s good. These players are honestly just as much the cause of low US winrates as the low level premium players.
Im not sure what youre saying. This whole thread has more than half the community who voted, voting to re-eff the abrams out of spite, instead of looking at the issue which is gaijin.
What are you on about? Did you even understand what I said
So its immature to cut through the bullshit and see how childish this entire threads purpose is? Did you even read the poll? Have you been reading the comments here. Its literally implying all M1s should be reverted since no other western nations get a reload fix yet. Thats the advocation here
You might not think thats what this means, but thats whatll happen, thats how gaijin works.
And people are actually just asking for that here.
People need to 1. Stop undercutting realism because they have a disgusting nationalistic pride
And 2. Divert infighting to actually banding together.
Of course im mad and going to call it out. Its pathetic
That is the weird thing. Reloads have always been exempted from realism as a balance tool, we know this and so does Gaijin. Why the fancy talk around it in the blog.
The “We buffed the reload because it was technically possible because these rounds are a similar in length blah blah” was all just BS. All just fancy talk to make it look like Gaijin was actually doing something, while in reality they were just completely caught with their pants down by US top tier performance.
I do agree though that infighting should stop. However there are also multiple other buffs to the SEPv2 that it should have, after which the reload buff is reverted or other NATO tanks get brought up to the same standards.
